Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 02 April 2014 12:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED31E1A01F5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 05:06:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RhTGAcF9nu2T for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 05:06:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com (mail-wg0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E2F1A01EC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Apr 2014 05:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id x13so107610wgg.14 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 05:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=YTLEjpOmcF+557GC0YywkpK31rFoMynCqXmaA2KPq7Q=; b=oVYV+QFGPl9Kdbp5MzNmo737pypceuvjVqpASK5v8MIoUODGCb5gCU40i7CSGdYl76 v8/zaa6RwJXluT8/Dq0xYapp1qfoNxP1lKjwMDUPCXrvX0HAC2f8OYsXaNK7eUDkA1uq 0cVJ3XIOPpbB1751F9KAuPLkmxmqBYIGvu0b1ljkDuQ2E2kUnHYW+gGWEVfWL/Wd0N0P L9mL4tAWrBal/bo5Kl4+eOwIzPIVTvGLZZTs6iJbaenehPunPsUNV7vx8pUFmgf0M6qH oInsoKnS/TAvoPl8VnnxwEWj/1tyhKkN2LyTARL33ZYPRs9TrOt388oHqXpkAudUufKu LPHg==
X-Received: by 10.194.57.38 with SMTP id f6mr45868wjq.59.1396440396352; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 05:06:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.24.251.171] (dyn32-131.checkpoint.com. [194.29.32.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n41sm4111297eeg.4.2014.04.02.05.06.34 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Apr 2014 05:06:35 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_823C0483-4E73-4C7D-A4C2-855B3A9F139A"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.2 \(1874\))
Subject: Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+LwhNS-iKuzSCb0dhBypVFVzmi7HCZFvGNGExL5WtJ1jhsg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2014 15:06:31 +0300
Message-Id: <59C504C7-9E84-4CE8-B46D-A5E90329C0C8@gmail.com>
References: <20140401220040.F06667FC394@rfc-editor.org> <CAA=duU2cV0XLctSBeeW8OtXnCSYDGeWJUyv_uGT25V-4N+J8EA@mail.gmail.com> <AE6C1CD9-8E98-458B-8B53-A6275892471A@gmail.com> <0FA55A15-7D95-4AD9-B2FE-19C6C80CD377@me.com> <CAMm+LwhNS-iKuzSCb0dhBypVFVzmi7HCZFvGNGExL5WtJ1jhsg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1874)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7PB3RiqfsREvJsMMzjTOtoDNhag
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 12:06:46 -0000

On Apr 2, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hallam@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com> wrote:
> As any Brit will tell you: ice has absolutely NOTHING to do with tea, so it would be out of scope.
> 
> Sat-too-long-and-is-still-hot is, if I recall, known as "stewed" and anyone responsible faces possible deportation from the UK. A very serious matter indeed, almost as serious as refusing to obey the rules of a queue.
> 
> Oh we have discovered over the years that people have the oddest ideas on how to make tea.
> 
> Here in Boston there was a group that made tea with salt water some years back. Turned out the only solution was kicking them out of the empire.

The problem with that tea was not the salt. That turns out to be customary in Mongolia. The real issue that the tea was “weak, bordering on homeopathic”:

http://what-if.xkcd.com/79/

We can’t have that.

Yoav