Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 16 May 2018 23:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C93512DA44 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2018 16:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NEOTcFzF_Bcw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 May 2018 16:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4DFD12DA3D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 May 2018 16:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [209.171.88.177]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C16F1F906 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 May 2018 23:25:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id E224C137D; Thu, 17 May 2018 00:25:31 +0100 (BST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Agenda experiment for IETF 103 in November in Bangkok
In-reply-to: <E9D4D65580FE1097406E9B9F@PSB>
References: <A299772BE5B81D3F99BCCCE9@10.0.0.22> <CA+9kkMBJZC4zJW0i=wzHECgPot=wjxQeVHi1NDfhCsTvicgeOA@mail.gmail.com> <E9D4D65580FE1097406E9B9F@PSB>
Comments: In-reply-to John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> message dated "Wed, 16 May 2018 17:26:27 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 19:25:31 -0400
Message-ID: <20275.1526513131@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7R-Ma8q8wX5JAQCZwUyCXyKRyLs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 23:25:59 -0000

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:
    > organization.  Suppose someone (or several people) for whom I'm
    > responsible are really good implementers.  Suppose they come to me and
    > say something that I hear as "we would like to go to IETF a day or two
    > early, incur additional costs for hotels and the like that we expect
    > you to pay for, and spend the time doing programming on their work
    > rather than yours/ the company's".  I wouldn't predict good results, at
    > least unless I hear the request as including "if you don't let me do
    > this, I'm likely to start looking for another job" and, of course, that
    > might or might not work.

"Boss, J,K,Q and I will be working 30 hours overtime (each) that weekend getting
the interoperability bugs out of the code before we go to the IETF meeting
about the specification that determines what code we are supposed to write".

It actually won't get to "looking for another job", because the person likely
left when the IETF support went away.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-