Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternatives
Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Sat, 13 November 2010 01:17 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F053A67E4 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:17:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DrtM-bmDQelX for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCCF3A67A3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.1.87.158] ([124.193.12.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oAD1I50s008827 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:18:15 -0800
Message-ID: <4CDDE747.2070100@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:17:59 +0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternatives
References: <B7E5004532B85C156EFB0760@JcK-eee10.meeting.ietf.org> <4CDDCF41.9000302@dcrocker.net> <A897B8CF161FFC3547E41D52@JcK-eee10.meeting.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <A897B8CF161FFC3547E41D52@JcK-eee10.meeting.ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Fri, 12 Nov 2010 17:18:17 -0800 (PST)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 01:17:49 -0000
On 11/13/2010 7:49 AM, John C Klensin wrote: > At the end of an IETF week, I guess we are all > tired. Please note the comma and parse that as Actually I think this was karmic retribution. I should have taken my own advice and waited to get my coffee... d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- Two step, three step, one step, and alternatives John C Klensin
- Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternati… John C Klensin
- Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternati… Dave CROCKER
- Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternati… Eric Burger
- Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternati… Eliot Lear
- Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternati… John C Klensin
- Re: Two step, three step, one step, and alternati… Spencer Dawkins