IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: hop-by-hop and router alert options [Re: Question about use of RSVP in Production Networks]

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Wed, 11 August 2004 12:47 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA00384; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:47:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BusaH-0006hV-1T; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:52:01 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BusP5-00081F-Qj; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:40:27 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BusLV-0007Fy-FJ for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:36:45 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA29624 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp ([131.112.32.132]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BusDM-0005lQ-Th for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:28:22 -0400
Received: (qmail 23571 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2004 12:21:06 -0000
Received: from yahoobb219178198081.bbtec.net (HELO necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp) (219.178.198.81) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 11 Aug 2004 12:21:06 -0000
Message-ID: <411A0FA4.7040706@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 21:23:00 +0900
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: ja, en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408111448190.24098-100000@netcore.fi>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0408111448190.24098-100000@netcore.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: hop-by-hop and router alert options [Re: Question about use of RSVP in Production Networks]
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: cf4fa59384e76e63313391b70cd0dd25
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Pekka Savola wrote:

> I'd be in favor of deprecating the IP router alert option completely.  
> Effectively this affects RSVP and MLD *).  I'd want to similarly do
> away with the IPv6 Hop-by-Hop options.  At the very least, I'd like to
> prevent further standardization of these options.

Multicast packets to RVP/Core are even more harmful.

							Masataka Ohta


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status