Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
James Seng <james.seng@gmail.com> Sun, 29 January 2017 19:08 UTC
Return-Path: <james.seng@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004EA129446; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:08:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sA8Hl7egDne6; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:08:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb0-x232.google.com (mail-yb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9978512958B; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:08:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb0-x232.google.com with SMTP id w194so185938164ybe.0; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:08:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jX6EAQvNL9wU7Uo9lP1fJx3lk1T2A6aEaS5bwQHA3iI=; b=QQhe6EeHhiVvyFuJlpL6zJq7WOw9uPkJCIYIhH9VG0932FtPveXIW1PfuPFzfHMvAW o01Z8+HULkWsAxUIEltnTi4cCQ/n9zrRcpmmQZAIKVkPQEiOCX0CV9EsbCI5qRE2EXcg 9fTR4V8qEzhnWJFKuCOPsNu8Xq1uB53gWhh7kkg8oOHbXqoiJckawKAlQq0+y7s22XZ/ OeFw5ARCAsdHL4cl5DkyY0gq7kwXS3+iskDW4VlkGizZUVFZjtmpat5ncMu6XQBR7rz6 Sr61eC7gJ3GUQKGJfhsfH6P/pXTUTTbe96Yk52uZ6DCkBBjc3siGDZ2BPgONQ4NLurh8 Bc0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jX6EAQvNL9wU7Uo9lP1fJx3lk1T2A6aEaS5bwQHA3iI=; b=dR+a1KxjAg4r0VlMgBNb2PnuzMtF/Bm3K3JbajCZBQ+r5nf2AYzWdM8mrsQg00jH9P dthj6XC1UcJ1pO5QZ0l+Sy4TRMHXAGKG/d/r6vVKWvOIRWUeCDbwAvPfpm55Iell45Xj lPinXt36YiuHfYTPUqHLAcDRu1POGiJcuApkZF9HQA/6f2VH92tlY4AQA5DihiriJJmR sZ1d7nab1snMRStjhhb/yfNGAvWqJ/bnMzvZAv53U+Hg3UOzAB9jw6umUXqKUzUXRpOf OUUXFpXVlJ4Imh0G+NUI7BB80XYJl+ZXjX1p1O7LSASMa8QfKpHHd/Xf+4y4+OVmZ7a1 8sIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJRaG5HLXeAt5Mop1WOdEemzcnhuCav43OxLWlO7c4aGvDSBKm6lgesVZxDYLtf0d3jLx+nbg3vXVj/lg==
X-Received: by 10.37.6.195 with SMTP id 186mr8371927ybg.136.1485716921861; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:08:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.13.226.21 with HTTP; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:08:11 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CA+ruDECdMAC2PQqibqQijc-nLHUxOGw0h-ZYyh8FnZZaeZ8sTA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160525220818.18333.71186.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <700D9CB7-4EFD-459B-AA12-133A6BB04E90@senki.org> <1C8639E6-1058-4D04-84ED-0C354E6567D1@cisco.com> <9CBABA69-1814-4676-9C69-E129F04AD24C@cisco.com> <5DFDEA43-8156-491D-A300-2BCED1AED1A4@gmail.com> <5747909C.20403@si6networks.com> <955df2106aa2e12cefbd450be022e779.squirrel@www.trepanning.net> <D36D49EE.35116%jefft0@remap.ucla.edu> <CE39F90A45FF0C49A1EA229FC9899B05266663BF@USCLES544.agna.amgreetings.com> <CA+ruDECdMAC2PQqibqQijc-nLHUxOGw0h-ZYyh8FnZZaeZ8sTA@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Seng <james.seng@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 03:08:11 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+ruDEBHyzk5cg5Vmq-anKJTxLkZpHrb9APwkfbDGn6FeFzR_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100
To: "MH Michael Hammer (5304)" <MHammer@ag.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113f5b0a5d4d4d0547406dcf"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7YkLFlZFsB9Fi8p2kd1TaVinkk8>
Cc: "recentattendees@ietf.org" <recentattendees@ietf.org>, "Thompson, Jeff" <jefft0@remap.ucla.edu>, "Ietf@Ietf. Org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 19:08:45 -0000
I rescind my previous comment that the scenario I painted is rhetorical. None of our US fellow IETFers here have any moral authority to talk about "inclusive" ever again. -James Seng On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 5:44 AM, James Seng <james.seng@gmail.com> wrote: > Since after 9-11, things have change a lot for United States[1]. > > Especially for TSA, I remember going to SFO the first time after 9-11, it > took me 2 hours just to clear the security and I missed my flight. I also > remember pre 9-11, I could get into US for less than 15-20mins. > > Now, for my American friends who pay in the price in time, let me tell you > what we non-American citizen has to do to get into US after 9-11. We have > been tagged, photographed, fingerprinted, all our 10 fingers every time we > have to enter US. We have been systematically profiled, often by racial or > nationality, and some of us have to go through enhanced body-to-body search > everytime we cross security. I was put in a "Muslim" basket been a > Malaysian for a while so ... And we have to do it with a smile because if > any of us pull of a stunt like Aaron Tobey[2], we could be denied our entry > and possibility forever. > > My wife complains that the over the last decade I have put on a lot of > weight and asked me to check my photos. Unfortunately, I don't like selfie > nor do I like to take pictures of myself. But I told her not to worry as > TSA has a complete profile of me becoming fat over the years. > > Today, we all saw a US President may-to-be calling up to forbid Muslim to > enter US, to build walls to prevent people from the south, who threaten to > get even tougher to foreigners. > > So by the same principle that Jeff is advocate, that we hold IETF meeting > where "law declares some people less valid", I prognosticate we may no > longer able to hold our meetings in US. > > [1] http://www.ibtimes.com/pulse/united-states-after-911-6-thing > s-have-changed-2001-2093156 > > [2] http://dailylounge.com/the-daily/entry/how-to-fight-the-tsa > > ps: This is rhetorical to put any doubt in rest. I love US even though > getting there is still a pain for me. > > -James Seng > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:34 PM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) <MHammer@ag.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: ietf [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Thompson, Jeff >> > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2016 3:55 AM >> > To: Dan Harkins >> > Cc: recentattendees@ietf.org; Ietf@Ietf. Org >> > Subject: Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF >> > 100 >> > >> > On 2016/5/26, 21:11:51, "Recentattendees on behalf of Dan Harkins" >> > <recentattendees-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of dharkins@lounge.org> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > I would also like to suggest that the ability of certain members to >> > >bring their family on a vacation that coincides with an IETF should not >> > >be a governing factor in venue selection. Many people like to launder a >> > >business trip into a family vacation (myself >> > >included!) but that's not why the IETF exists and it should have no >> > >bearing on where we meet. >> > >> > So then, the IETF policy would read ³The IETF may hold meetings in >> countries >> > where the law declares some people less valid. If you are such a >> person, then >> > the IETF recommends that to avoid trouble with the law you should hide >> who >> > you are, including not bringing your family.² >> > >> > Is this the organization that the IETF is going to be? >> > >> > - Jeff >> > >> >> Jeff, >> >> Is there any country in the world that meets the standard your comment >> implies should be the IETF policy? Is this a case of perfection being the >> enemy of good? Perhaps it is a case of perfection being the enemy of >> reality. I don't know what IETF policy should be but I do recognize that >> there are very real limitations that constrain choices. I'll also point out >> that the choices made will constrain the choices of participants. I'm not >> advocating for any particular choice by the IETF with regard to meeting >> locations. >> >> Mike >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Recentattendees mailing list >> Recentattendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/recentattendees >> > > > > -- > -James Seng > -- -James Seng
- Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 IAOC Chair
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 George Michaelson
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Ted Hardie
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Margaret Cullen
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Benson Schliesser
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Benson Schliesser
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jakob Heitz
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Ted Hardie
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Benson Schliesser
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [E] Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singa… Gross, Scott W
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lixia Zhang
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Xiaohong Deng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mark Nottingham
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jose Saldana
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 tom p.
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Masataka Ohta
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ole Troan
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… otroan
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Leslie Daigle
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Dhruv Dhody
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Michael Richardson
- RE: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Lemon
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Harish Pillay
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 tom p.
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Masataka Ohta
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ted Lemon
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Barry Raveendran Greene
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Melinda Shore
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jeffrey (Zhaohui) Zhang
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… nalini.elkins
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Lawrence Conroy
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Hardie
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dave Crocker
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Melinda Shore
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Dave Crocker
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Jeffrey Haas
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Background on Singapore go/no go f… John C Klensin
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Niels ten Oever
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Keith Moore
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Margaret Cullen
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Carlos Martinez
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Melinda Shore
- IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: Re: [… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Keith Moore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Joel Snyder
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Joe Abley
- Re: IETF-100 maybe it's mostly been said? (Was: R… Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Aaron Morgan
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Derek Jett
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dan Harkins
- Why we meet (was Re: [Recentattendees] Background… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Masataka Ohta
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Thompson, Jeff
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… PEDRO ANDRES ARANDA GUTIERREZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dave Crocker
- Re: Background on Singapore go/no go for IETF 100 Marc Blanchet
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Leslie Daigle
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Donald Eastlake
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Margaret Cullen
- Success metrics Re: [Recentattendees] Background … Bill Mills
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Rich Kulawiec
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… kathleen.moriarty.ietf
- Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recentatten… Melinda Shore
- RE: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recenta… Christer Holmberg
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Jamie Baxter
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dave Hood
- Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recenta… Stephen Strowes
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Robert O'Callahan
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Masataka Ohta
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Value of meeting attendance (was Re: [Recenta… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Fernando Gont
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Marie-Jose Montpetit
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Michal Krsek
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… lloyd.wood
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John Levine
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John Levine
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… James Seng
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Rich Kulawiec
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Dan Harkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mani, Mehdi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mani, Mehdi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Naeem Khademi
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mani, Mehdi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Alexander Nevalennyy
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Mary B
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Eggert, Lars
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Yoav Nir
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Michael StJohns
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… David Morris
- RE: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Randal Atkinson
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tim Chown
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… nalini.elkins
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… John C Klensin
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Tim Chown
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Naeem Khademi
- Re: [Recentattendees] Background on Singapore go/… Brian Ford (brford)