Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 23 February 2016 18:29 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E807A1B402E; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:29:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cHJJFNhIBwbU; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD2091B404A; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:29:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCD7BE7D; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:29:03 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IkYjuw7z2LOF; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:29:02 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [172.25.1.31] (rrcs-67-52-140-5.west.biz.rr.com [67.52.140.5]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8B872BDD0; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:29:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1456252142; bh=oDBsiY+VT30tmX7O2nL2jUnFU9MTqyAr4gn8bzvSCDQ=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=uzhHSAbk0bdSvIX04ptA3TF41JK/KWbR85tEg7O+jvzIczDOpsvaDoM8GF/w8CJVv L/y8FOU5Xlfg3VU+nN4Yh3JMqUUGQC6ZBZobNXxWbX7fdUXuLvSQeRg8TAQXvz+ECX 8dMFxSlCELRrBs9RUQtBo8HB3hXHhudjkf291jIA=
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-06.txt> (Anonymity profile for DHCP clients) to Proposed Standard
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
References: <20160201142413.30288.23248.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr11tEDEPXkUWj4g_-wL=AgYRu7LYrOkgobEMtwOW4CpEA@mail.gmail.com> <003001d1687a$926ab2e0$b74018a0$@huitema.net> <56C3161F.3070301@innovationslab.net> <CAKD1Yr15EYQdS3XR4zenqmpBn2K2Zue2a+mMz1m+Vw54ou7zZQ@mail.gmail.com> <56CB891E.6060902@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr3MdjMrMMW+Mv2n_Ls+94Ry23e8Y_LCXhH1t4nF9Rjm4w@mail.gmail.com> <56CBA305.1050400@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr3fA4+vdfUbxxxVvbpy8JRHC8TuKqXHHv6F9HBj2rL=fA@mail.gmail.com> <56CC3BA3.2050303@si6networks.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <56CCA4EA.1020709@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:28:58 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56CC3BA3.2050303@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms050003040308080004000804"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7b-xcqIECNjEJjorHSRJFKFYsNQ>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile@ietf.org, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:29:08 -0000


On 23/02/16 10:59, Fernando Gont wrote:
> 
> I'm not saying the above is good or bad, but that's an update, and
> deserves a corresponding "update tag".

FWIW, I've no opinion here but please be aware that different working
definitions of the "updates" relationship are concurrently in use in
different bits of the IETF. For some, it means "you really need to
read this" for others its "a new implementer of the old thing really
needs to also include the new code" and those aren't always the same.
There are probably other not-unreasonable meanings one could come up
with too. I'd not get hung up on it generally myself.

S.