Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria

Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Wed, 19 October 2005 19:04 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESJF9-0007ih-MZ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:04:55 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1ESJF6-0007iK-EN for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:04:52 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA07079 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:04:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sb7.songbird.com ([208.184.79.137]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESJQr-0005Mp-J7 for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:17:03 -0400
Received: from [192.168.0.3] (adsl-71-131-80-68.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net [71.131.80.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by sb7.songbird.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j9JJ5MBe018742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:05:22 -0700
Message-ID: <435698C5.8030605@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 12:04:37 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.4 (Windows/20050908)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ed Juskevicius <edj@nortel.com>
References: <0BDFFF51DC89434FA33F8B37FCE363D502882EEA@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
In-Reply-To: <0BDFFF51DC89434FA33F8B37FCE363D502882EEA@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SongbirdInformation: support@songbird.com for more information
X-Songbird: Found to be clean
X-Songbird-From: dhc2@dcrocker.net
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF Meeting Venue Selection Criteria
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Ed Juskevicius wrote:
> The "ideal" venue (if there is such a thing) would enable both:
> - good participation from WG primary contributors AND
> - lots of local participation
>
> The second factor is important, imho, because a fraction of local
> newbies are going to be impressed by their IETF experience, and will
> want to participate again in the future.  The may well become primary
> contributors themselves down the road.

Is that hope for future participation by new attendees an acceptable 
basis for making venue choices that hurt current participation by 
primary contributors? 

What is the evidence that we will not gain that new participation 
without hurting current participation by primary contributors?

d/


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf