Re: Qualifying for NomCom

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DFE12D198 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:09:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fmzN1qbjAPLO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:09:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vk0-x229.google.com (mail-vk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1988712D0E1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id t129so30919438vkg.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=2+FSDfHK7cCKqozXgIehrFU3mcYqfjmwKmz273msmQQ=; b=eXVzcDQGHUnuaoISHaZENFyLEeTYIgec/CpaCsVYqA3fBWwYKXnolcD31mU44DgSL3 /goAxSX68WfQscrgWMu6vk8Z016jme+Lg1RfXKr6ysRr9KW31xS/eNWspBlUcBaaQXzL IcMCgH5SKRmjQAArX6tkl1yslBCm5X4RfvRF+wAYSx6xTbrRCokxDEZYd1/y3q4+OUen psI4G7Y+tA0WtUfWjMDMqFDoOeoZygZCHP6qJjOxxh2n0TX0vqOTFEmRHgeYvc2Aw1sP Q/0rMKFNbtqyu1ru4qSkgd+TzAPCwD6f1RF7IRmxsIpbL5KAhaUdj4w4rwOR/p2OCxQe 7rjw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=2+FSDfHK7cCKqozXgIehrFU3mcYqfjmwKmz273msmQQ=; b=VqOJ5EkU94mcU7chmMxWPRyxNBIS969RSKfjkdZN42MRvzDuY2hQqZTC/yL5nBsZuZ WKYFGYApJZ/wRniCGnaI8N0yvhcNIzqzrXF0MkRu+6ZoCGv19t5PsynqBDK80jLkmWGf 1Ck+ahnoi02UfDnPlAwAb9mTkC4u+PMhXnWBcSq8CvnM1EeNvXykYMO+Ix+KEJq+LKM7 s22KGySEB3fCCd/AamGnkV9Kvlk97r234wEBUB5UgA1WVtMa9fAqDkEYAww42mgwUePq yxQw7bPt4UibUcwfj3L3CyyLH5R89lTMH/HzYShWedact4IJYvzkkIyYu2oF2ygaE2g0 98kA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI2ipZSE1tKNaSkGqlI7CXl4AsmX6vEurBTF3x+gHS+q+ArOEhD32k91P/Hjz6IEniwuivyyDDZ7n4J7Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.176.0.8 with SMTP id 8mr2228944uai.67.1460066959278; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.103.43.5 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5E36120B-6D4E-4C0D-9905-2C698455D395@att.com>
References: <CAL0qLwY0FuDp5=RMFEhUMtkK=XNDxX2dogvVY7+OSy88jrrvOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=SYpo-CiHoc07Ukb04Kb1LGV2=BPPyRLUsaqyLM9Hbwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwbhYRqw7fXHzYY0=W-CpmeHeDdaZx3z2Qg0cA2aMrmVwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPt1N1nqmC7NJyg2M6Na8vUj8T-qObO-1gHFEXZzrobb3oOQhA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwZHGa5OvSmZ=bTd6AWchsm4r=QaJn2nPqD+YjeWPmH9pA@mail.gmail.com> <24691.1460062367@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <5706CC94.3080804@gmail.com> <CAL0qLwYvCpL9wwHL0E33HRbMvcckpad=gV-VYgAomJpCdiSrpg@mail.gmail.com> <5E36120B-6D4E-4C0D-9905-2C698455D395@att.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:09:19 -0300
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwak6GRDYAcYqdOewoSmRj6DP5ptQKjqXkOedBaHcKC7WA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Qualifying for NomCom
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141855a74cb03052fec548c
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7nW37qFgLwRwhzbtUsW9TZ2E6eI>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 22:09:22 -0000

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 7:06 PM, HANSEN, TONY L <tony@att.com> wrote:

>
> There's a fourth possible outcome: we've gathered enough information from
> the experiment that we know what we want to do and don't need to re-run
> another experiment in order to revise 7437.
>

Isn't that the same as the first outcome?

-MSK