Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback]

Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC7312003E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:46:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aF0kMDH1JgyQ; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io1-xd29.google.com (mail-io1-xd29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED8D12002E; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:46:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd29.google.com with SMTP id 1so25302186iou.4; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 18:46:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aX4mpIVKFYAr8HWwgQ8o36OP2+cCZ6hXQkJIu4hs68g=; b=Hb5zaHOcYTRjRQEsttXXBQYuEp4HzpjCBfFPs893CUSrWgUoFV/qYTOyRisJLP9SQJ /xYRr/7nupisGwYaGZglNJ6A4aa4USMkoviVsjzaDlP4cVjobHUftZ61YLbA7tEsHTSv 0zZhHTpBbP82W+xFtkaXR8oHvijz5CURFyyUG09vsDVZfAtxDeWbpTNiS+HvIBuEWva0 ofkI0BFuFcScAwv40tTTUOcaBxUXeA59tbcA0kH8gzH/En27SCGNJxvKuxwHZCz5H9wd HPzPDczW7pJHipOLSFQhMdMYtEUq657PWbkrhMHIeRp3iiqHRpVSYPkMzxHofOvFlHMW WVsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aX4mpIVKFYAr8HWwgQ8o36OP2+cCZ6hXQkJIu4hs68g=; b=BnkGpUyA33XMqxFkeZktE+DdJy+2drImQThcevcl0WFvcEMaBohY7jwN5+IyUXobKX wu+DuxoNzlfrCwHlPgjQlzkIZ/ZszLAKvGPBwJ7aaoWBdwY56qmG2TcHoGTLHfqLPl2y mf2Z4hPxH2Phic2So+YRgxNk/Lt9z3NpCKmIW8FM4kAt4XGPH4pL3zDwc4f3ZgJu+Bnm 0lLl86sAzbk358cGuTenz9Qmdmj2CldQFJgGg5uN6f/kTnIHdN33EOrRtFp07Ym9/FPq SWsbYwiqoN1v8DlcB0CBtUZuGm5GaDQGj+Iy2GcA12H2akZEbsDX1DXbx+EZO2CnEcBO xgvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUzyOFfeTVbtAO2NO4n6rqOHtce+QN3BN/+iLECZ4Q6NZjGOVah FBSSHwromSNGoutI2iCogfTA8jMcVG/NB2Ovq0U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzbfkWHHF/OSu3Gwam0lHZ0arlMRbBzj9X2d3tGOaSuJoTJHiQcItW95+0zJf8Lptw8LjvpKtACi1xsrpdYMsE=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:1489:: with SMTP id 131mr11634530iou.257.1573008382537; Tue, 05 Nov 2019 18:46:22 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <09886edb-4302-b309-9eaa-f016c4487128@gmail.com> <0053C5D9-E4D7-4BE0-9B73-3B7FC25561FB@akamai.com> <f0069562-5b4b-3a08-124f-1a8d24dfd0cd@cs.tcd.ie> <e7ebf607-cbf8-8ebf-9dca-0aec96ff517d@gmail.com> <20191105092422.GA61969@kduck.mit.edu> <ca7a87c8-d841-c13c-3131-aa44acac226f@gmail.com> <7E267F5B-0921-412F-B1A5-9A3E5096BD8F@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <7E267F5B-0921-412F-B1A5-9A3E5096BD8F@mnot.net>
From: Rob Sayre <sayrer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 18:46:08 -0800
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sw4zMkVrpnQLfNHQ43H00JRThtHkAtXi8u6yWNLXOEXrw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: AD workload [was Re: NomCom 2019 Call for Community Feedback]
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org" <nomcom-chair-2019@ietf.org>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000deb58c0596a48dec"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7q4uZ4EYOyhOcf63P56_cK7bgJs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 02:46:25 -0000

On Tue, Nov 5, 2019 at 6:23 PM Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>; wrote:

> +1 to the Brian's thoughts below.
>
> I think this is one of the most important things we as a community need to
> address; we have a culture of expecting "heroes" to step up and take this
> job. That's going to bite us, sooner or later.
>

This message seems very correct to me.

A first step might be to evaluate the degree to which the IETF is viewed as
a spec printer. I've been on the IETF list for 15 years (mostly silently),
and I think most documents are pretty bad.

thanks,
Rob