IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: pgp signing in van

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Mon, 09 September 2013 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BC021F9D4C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kox+Yl3JWa6i for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4088821F9DB4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 06:50:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 44651 invoked from network); 9 Sep 2013 13:50:11 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 9 Sep 2013 13:50:11 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=522dd213.xn--btvx9d.k1309; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=86vTcNfluvs1QTeCUofSeW7wo+RJUhfMF1AVaps5Jxo=; b=hWzGp6POXFqxqKRy7Rc0G8mgyqxbTYd9oHBoq6sWrMF4zp6x0fiz6bEZjdKEOpQVDPS5Rpoll5+ZuqwUzx5tzFb50HzT3Pdt9FY773O1aK+8QLn+Rd7THbgj7z2MZ8KOS4on9iNj35VY1q0GgV69MtRHqTojdM4P+N+BxyyuqcHVLuu4M7pojESDJvBepELmcnyvlsbD/N691KE6D+yy/B0IMbMkT51/HsfC05iXtsggt69fFvjLoBxBtLwuNH3N
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=522dd213.xn--btvx9d.k1309; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=86vTcNfluvs1QTeCUofSeW7wo+RJUhfMF1AVaps5Jxo=; b=FkI30LLGs59KeYAKP17l1Wr4cl5VHyc9R4pKVaGeB2f27Jg5dirib7gS0vI8VkGowZIA6fpXHztJj2+o1G3WL0IKB8EMHEBuhSgiZUbp4hFej6a1sq3smCE9x9JUfiK92YLy+AZrdMI6hyzSgA7jB1Fy+go3wItagAkD7XnfgjtKsp2iqW7AHqp/XcNLZ2dWFIenFvmCtdjgTuzINII4fGwhw8CPcS1Ej0mFNx5gVgGhBM4+fwHTJBMiLUWvtFrL
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 13:49:49 -0000
Message-ID: <20130909134949.30687.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: pgp signing in van
In-Reply-To: <522DC214.6010107@stpeter.im>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 13:53:05 -0000

>Why do you think that cryptographic doubt = legal doubt? I've heard
>that claim many times, but I've never heard an argument for it.

Having attempted to explain technology in court as an expert witness,
I find the assertion risible.

R's,
John

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email