IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Enabling DMARC workaround code for all IETF/IRTF mailing lists

Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> Fri, 11 May 2018 22:04 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D3F128954 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2018 15:04:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7xErdk2gjdce for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2018 15:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mournblade.imrryr.org (mournblade.imrryr.org [108.5.242.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89BAC127863 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2018 15:04:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.161] (straasha.imrryr.org [100.2.39.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mournblade.imrryr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D54467A3309 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2018 22:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ietf-dane@dukhovni.org)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Subject: Re: Enabling DMARC workaround code for all IETF/IRTF mailing lists
From: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
In-Reply-To: <20180511215115.37389266D3D1@ary.qy>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 18:04:56 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
Message-Id: <7BE5D7F2-56B7-4497-A3BE-5EF82C52F479@dukhovni.org>
References: <20180511215115.37389266D3D1@ary.qy>
To: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/7vx-6Q956mNeLwoCg-sHy9H-0p8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 22:04:59 -0000


> On May 11, 2018, at 5:51 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:
> 
> It's a kludge, remember.

Yes.  The kludge I would prefer is prepending the unmolested author
address to the Reply-To: header.  Many lists do this.  It is ugly,
but does not alter or break the reverse path, and IMHO less ugly
than address munging.

-- 
	Viktor.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email