Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps

Ted Lemon <> Tue, 04 July 2017 13:42 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A633F1315FE for <>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cm68z2CjGSpv for <>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23E9413189B for <>; Tue, 4 Jul 2017 06:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id i2so165585330qta.3 for <>; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 06:42:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bFtdKImyVeWgMcWbEVh+l51Oz8dDVKMn9yJXspDRaik=; b=o4ffzbXpnQNnWcPwkCozdShAFN0x+GvaMOzFegL5CiMU4ehb51Zr+PtBeek+nMtIlo zdIzJ0HRg7udTHRk/I/FcefHXCR8hNaeY3QzcC1HO7zsu1D6eY1IYAATNtbM/H6Pv6mb y/X99aVN0G4fL/7/iS68kzMxNdz1J0eeoNS3b+uNWc2NNSLpK3wB1JVvRDZCS+aw4SQa O8u+v5C9C2Mgs3BPHM65nno+21AcXNuN2xHexn1lKx2esZePRt43le7IVB60/LAUDz2B e0K6BfY9qgYVLHms5HC0CeM7haptoR7CoZJolSb0Nadj33Co+fyvrt8p1MKGnNA6Ti0P 4gUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bFtdKImyVeWgMcWbEVh+l51Oz8dDVKMn9yJXspDRaik=; b=q1T+Yb41vqC6VsuZ6lpNkz0DKX0RXZDJVmnHEoqy1vlxDH/m2whphaEwrR/hA9oOHA 3+iO+cQaG5aTqYhSAr5NdnVJ64zCr21MNx4xXVnQ/HPTUv+4geP/9b5dbBhH7q3vC1ne Jq+eL+PwPLUrwF9Zo+TBxdeBdhxDDgX+wR4/ewzvYij+qm6m6JnF08Cazafm2IIz/d4J Kzz99ZnW4z6VUrOhXKuC3w6Sk+lp7cHVi0iUAJnhgLGQ/bUkITPM/XkALOK06YtrVU8C mC38u4T2kDE+HJ+XmRdLxQONbh8fBMxuGKUGgiK1Fb7rILEblZnKpaGFoKZ5U/alllj1 C9dg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw112lSDFy0MbvBKeCVkpQ0a7pjkBW3WmXWh/pEj8jlSUHIrRXplan P+NcdEHbeobUrZ9r
X-Received: by with SMTP id 88mr17839861qtf.17.1499175729237; Tue, 04 Jul 2017 06:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [] ( []) by with ESMTPSA id j75sm13632154qke.34.2017. (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Jul 2017 06:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-C7F39176-8C3A-4238-8F80-116006D97642
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: Minor editorial change to draft-ietf-dnsop-sutld-ps
From: Ted Lemon <>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (15A5304i)
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 09:42:07 -0400
Cc: Warren Kumari <>,, IETF Rinse Repeat <>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <>
References: <> <> <> <>
To: Randy Bush <>
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2017 13:42:12 -0000

On Jul 4, 2017, at 9:37 AM, Randy Bush <> wrote:
> how depressing.  one obvious curiousity is who asked the one-sided
> question?  otoh, maybe i don't want to know.  but i wish you had
> perceived a wider responsibility to the community.

It was discussed at length in the working group, so I would say that you could In principle have raised this concern sooner. However, I will admit that it didn’t occur to me to do so either. In any case, it really is a separate issue from that covered by this draft, and so there’s no reason why we can’t do this work if you think it’s worth doing. Given the situation with ICANN and GTLD, it may be moot, but I wouldn’t mind writing it down.