Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?

Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com> Sun, 16 February 2020 21:06 UTC

Return-Path: <olejacobsen@me.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F623120048 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 13:06:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=me.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AMmsIrD_McET for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 13:06:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mr85p00im-hyfv06011301.me.com (mr85p00im-hyfv06011301.me.com [17.58.23.184]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A40012002E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 13:06:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=me.com; s=1a1hai; t=1581887211; bh=edAX+tHvAQDnmw8ZvS3sMFxHfTJaRA4zxqzzL/i5eiM=; h=Content-Type:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=x2GKu8xAgaPf9PnOWM8v/KwjhrzwND/gAOahM/Ec+lGxMj3iHqt7VG55aQRX/DeKp QMKMLxG/OmzCPAU4hZ9f9/AK3mFRHzfDf6L2WJFW+miuuRg7PGH2gbO0awaCkWWQ3b peTa/dRWtRpnoeg06fur2HE4yD74wkio5N9eq0q8reJuOBze8oMnyDOiVy4o77Etc5 0aTvp1JZzBuBlDpmGvcLG8yhTpSUPB2CpT255gtmIo47/EZZDxV8I2bx7u7DRm47j9 UePgiqcfsPY1iaV0/hG5wGJhJFJ9C5BIGVb5dhIfEidi3Xa4q/rKLlqEHLJU9eXcVi iOg6NCGCyfTCQ==
Received: from [10.250.172.73] (unknown [203.3.109.196]) by mr85p00im-hyfv06011301.me.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 817005801FA; Sun, 16 Feb 2020 21:06:51 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-A4680110-0EB8-43E2-8C34-25737E752227
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
From: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <066A4043-1390-4895-A3F8-0D6849A9967F@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:06:49 +1100
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <059D8F35-5889-4CAF-9D94-CEF3D0C73EF7@me.com>
References: <066A4043-1390-4895-A3F8-0D6849A9967F@ietf.org>
To: Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2020-02-16_05:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=786 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-2002160192
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/85DFWPweM3hb7yeKfRM2NU_udnk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 21:06:54 -0000

My point: These blanket travel bans are NOT “government imposed,” but rather a matter of *corporate* policy in many cases.

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor & Publisher
The Internet Protocol Journal
Cell: +1 415 370-4628
T-Mobile: +1 415 889-9821
Docomo: +81 90 3337 9311‬
http://protocoljournal.org

Sent from my iPhone

> On 17 Feb 2020, at 07:16, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
>>> Yes.  A blanket travel ban is a government imposed travel restriction and so we will provide a full refund in that instance.  To confirm, the list of possible government imposed travel restrictions now includes (but is not limited to):
>> 
>> 	- denial of exit
>> 	- denial of entry
>> 	- diversion
>> 	- repatriation
>> 	- isolation
>> 	- quarantine.
>> 	- blanket travel bans
>> 
>> Jay
>> 
>> 
>> Ole J. Jacobsen
>> Editor & Publisher
>> The Internet Protocol Journal
>> Cell: +1 415 370-4628
>> T-Mobile: +1 415 889-9821
>> Docomo: +81 90 3337 9311‬
>> http://protocoljournal.org
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On 14 Feb 2020, at 14:57, Jay Daley <jay@ietf.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Just in case anyone is confused by this, the recently announced policy is for a full refund in the case of *any* government imposed travel restrictions that prevent someone attending the meeting, which may include, but are not limited to, denial of exit, denial of entry, diversion, repatriation, isolation and quarantine.
>>> 
>>> Jay
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jay Daley
>>> IETF Executive Director
>>> jay@ietf.org
> 
> -- 
> Jay Daley
> IETF Executive Director
> jay@ietf.org
> +64 21 678840
>