Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Sun, 02 December 2012 20:21 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F8E21F878B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:21:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E-JVJ3O6kTat for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE50621F8789 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 12:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id hz11so1336573pad.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:21:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9wXH1Y6PM12LkRjdBp3H4wY7UfKezje+oZOK2jxws4c=; b=mTrbr7xx99XPu36Y8HV8qkwUFJFgbl9KZAqFzh4pcfIHeoKJqggepap1IiHK0y0nXT QqZS6oDGqWbuJeJ6dkf2L/vKOtwGVzNIYehVfFqUhqfkQ4ojzIfgVLAKPIDTMTw4zYGs 50+mWTbj5J4EimT7np+QVcuHFi8yGBZqTth39Quk149rbCYs69Nhmpnkan4DC0uiFVJF Q0sxq0ZHVbCFHoAYrprj6gH48buShYlAwQOZL9qMr6MKq/m/y4xL8Uqe5QnFUiUAvg+c 2btCNVIZMZMSsMFeOzOANSLSPL5IXDqtlVLeyYEXni6/wsFKVM6WOOLcHeRtBh3PB2Hb RBxw==
Received: by 10.69.1.73 with SMTP id be9mr23769353pbd.116.1354479716636; Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spandex.local (66-230-86-19-rb1.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [66.230.86.19]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mz10sm6756827pbc.37.2012.12.02.12.21.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 02 Dec 2012 12:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <50BBB862.8090209@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 11:21:54 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Creating an IETF Working Group Draft
References: <2671C6CDFBB59E47B64C10B3E0BD5923033897C9BF@PRVPEXVS15.corp.twcable.com> <01a701cdcd81$7d365380$77a2fa80$@olddog.co.uk> <50BBA236.9010603@dcrocker.net> <50BBB79C.40106@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50BBB79C.40106@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 20:21:57 -0000

On 12/2/12 11:18 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> 
> 	In Section 2.1, I would add in specifically-inappropriate criteria:
> 
> 	- Accept an I+D for the merely fact to have a more structured
> discussion in the WG.

I'm actually not sure about that.  It seems to me that in the past
we've had working group documents which were not intended for
publication, and I think they'd fall under this criterion.  I may
be misremembering.  At any rate I'm not sure I see the value in
ruling these out.

Melinda