IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?

William Ivancic <ivancic@syzygyengineering.com> Thu, 23 October 2014 12:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ivancic@syzygyengineering.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0B41A9049 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gz8ee4B9flI1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm6-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm6-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.154]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D46981A906C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:47:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [98.138.100.113] by nm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2014 12:47:07 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.171] by tm104.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2014 12:47:07 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1027.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 23 Oct 2014 12:47:07 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 169060.34911.bm@omp1027.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 14376 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Oct 2014 12:47:07 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1414068427; bh=9q4EH4jDQLWtckhEBIVFULshm02Sv7y7yNEltwK7fLc=; h=References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4BR5a/Wtx/W4+uu5+nOV/fZodcue2E0ChjmYiZhjLxkDb/MPw4IC0P2VdNUfD0GChxTHBKgXbaDh8KkGiQpnznDiNTGVrUfsVBSBSPCJsk9fZ5JMWOGmc8P/oROnpZEyf5RVyqH4tiC1vuT1TOgV3Q9s6quzSLbIgGUrxdSwVzE=
X-YMail-OSG: 1PZ4rFUVM1l2pkZkLgNzfTNtu5jQ8avouYSdu.tgkAAuqS1 1vinJ435xpVw2Io7WiFn1ofAsAN8MrnKg7ZMn3d7a4ZvLXJeaUTRD4YjM5Q3 cT8iLpVTHQklAFtQZ.aZDq0ByzL6cJZgjvrNtI89IPe5K6k9G7Em0vQvysdY ZiXyIwk.76_EqBsyY9dQEh8fVPvO9wsmCGOJL.QWVnpXnq_XvrqG1UXe1wwl WfZmGuSPIGRmDxqi4i2jAGzo8_7mgjCZlYMGLLGqHMeviLCo8t7ta6J5atvb A0aB.oLjh_nkDU0Du6tP.GZzmyAOAKBKgrvHT0GWCUwSAajXjMhQeQwnebeq aeNTCKzIwxWH_SkGTI0Ckael9GpZ5Hpu7gVRAV_ypmxZ7pbKp1sEd7mAurDf OhQyp.M1ZuuQ7WOvt.adPuyak.awtPLuPl9wFPIsde8bIoyXyt9x.3l5OSA9 aZ5taCrNWIJH9.lo_fhBceXnZHcRDwCNztKtpuR6AdoJ9DSta760K4F_LAoH foQAbWjPkuI7gUMHRf7m8GyEYo0O2rx9VkMbiE5hgk61EdgwixI.0IgypOAE Zo3V20QCe9LhEZlxm5oLaiHkpwjCxjJdTVgyGDqGmCLigfjv23C65QkUZ_vS I7oPA8YHJJPykezhvKTd_kXMDXX1jirIiFiRPrHY5qskBYf9fK8La3hXAcbh D.TM-
Received: from [128.156.10.80] by web125106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:47:06 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SGkgS2V2aW4sCgpZZXMsIEkgd29ya2VkIGNsb3NlbHkgd2l0aCB0aGlzIGdyb3VwLiAgQ2hhcnQgMTkgc2F5cyBpdCBhbGwuIEJ1eSB0aGUgd2F5LCBkb24ndCBjb25mdXNlIHRoZSBuZWVkIGZvciBEVE4gd2l0aCB0aGUgbmVlZCBmb3IgdGhlIEJ1bmRsZSBwcm90b2NvbC4gIENoYXJ0IDE5IHN1cHBvcnRzIFdlcycgY29tbWVudHMuICBUaGVyZSBpcyBub3Qgd2F5IHRoaXMgZ3JvdXAgY2FuIGRlcGxveSBsYXJnZSBuZXR3b3JrcyB3aXRob3V0IGl0ZW0gMi4KCkNoYWxsZW5naW5nIG5ldHdvcmsgZW52aXJvbm0BMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.733
References: <1413638841.79127.YahooMailNeo@web28903.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <1413642432.88432.YahooMailNeo@web28901.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> <544630B5.3080006@gmail.com> <1413905917.2651.YahooMailNeo@web125103.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <1413935188.59957.YahooMailNeo@web125105.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <CAEFTjmV8K5tTJU+x3HWdFM+eja-Lr6+1V4LVc7YZwKAqrej8wA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1414068426.90690.YahooMailNeo@web125106.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 05:47:06 -0700
From: William Ivancic <ivancic@syzygyengineering.com>
Subject: Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
To: Kevin Fall <kfall@kfall.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEFTjmV8K5tTJU+x3HWdFM+eja-Lr6+1V4LVc7YZwKAqrej8wA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1552829269-1840498115-1414068426=:90690"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8JDufpHfHiExo6zjZ0rgmNIualI
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 10:50:28 -0700
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>, "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>, "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: William Ivancic <ivancic@syzygyengineering.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:47:12 -0000

Hi Kevin,

Yes, I worked closely with this group.  Chart 19 says it all. Buy the way, don't confuse the need for DTN with the need for the Bundle protocol.  Chart 19 supports Wes' comments.  There is not way this group can deploy large networks without item 2.

Challenging network environment leads to link and network disruptions

	1. Need to develop a robust DTNbased transport service 
	2. Requires solutions to addressing, routing, management, discovery and forwarding/QOS
I have not seen this group actively participating on any of the DTN mail list in the past year or two or perhaps more.  Time flies. 

Will




________________________________
 From: Kevin Fall <kfall@kfall.net>
To: William Ivancic <ivancic@syzygyengineering.com> 
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>; Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>; "iab@iab.org" <iab@iab.org>; "iesg@ietf.org" <iesg@ietf.org>; Lloyd Wood <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>; "dtn@ietf.org" <dtn@ietf.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: [dtn] proposed DTN workgroup - what is process being followed?
 

Based on a meeting I recently attended and 2014 references such as this:

(http://nsrc.cse.psu.edu/talks_2014/thoughts_on_future_army_waveforms_20Mar2014.pdf)

I cannot share your conclusion.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email