Re: Hotel situation

Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org> Sat, 09 January 2016 00:13 UTC

Return-Path: <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57741B2CC1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:13:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Quarantine-ID: <nKIPlfOV7NuK>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "MIME-Version"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nKIPlfOV7NuK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:13:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from turing.pensive.org (turing.pensive.org [99.111.97.161]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E611B1B2CB4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [99.111.97.136] (99.111.97.161) by turing.pensive.org with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:13:22 -0800
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240605d2b600eb4317@[99.111.97.136]>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1601050805290.17111@rabdullah.local>
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF6449900E0@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <CABmDk8n2TFvmoMVa8t3FOGXtKF9GUii=wrEyMpJucAoLzCix1Q@mail.gmail.com> <D38CB535C27A8E9D7B77BC2F@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <568B89BD.1040008@gmail.com> <7E1588330F38B7D9A45B189E@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <902D6B2A-7224-43A4-93D8-685E62D7542D@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|5d0b573d1b2ce2f5229d83cd4276a170s04EHY03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|902 D6B2A-7224-43A4-93D8-685E62D7542D@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <E628312DB341971BB1958397@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1601050805290.17111@rabdullah.local>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2016 16:13:19 -0800
To: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>
From: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@randy.pensive.org>
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8JtdgrUBg3COdq8GOjng0mQAeeY>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2016 00:13:24 -0000

At 8:19 AM -0800 1/5/16, Ole Jacobsen wrote:

>  Las Vegas would clearly win, but I have a strong impression that
>  many of our attendees would object to going there. (It also happens
>  to be a "tourist destination" for reasons that kind of escapes
>  me, but that's yet another discussion).

I'd be very upset if we started meeting in perhaps the last remaining 
all-smoking-all-the-time location in the U.S. or Canada.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up
because I wasn't a Communist.  Then they came for the Jews, and I
didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.  They came for the trade
unionists, I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.  Then
they came for Catholics, and I didn't speak up because I was a
Protestant.  Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left
to speak up.                                        --Martin Niemoell