IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fw: [Int-area] IETF 98 Minutes

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Sat, 08 April 2017 04:08 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8244129413 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 21:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TqocsJMh4yId for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 21:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C758A12778E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Apr 2017 21:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1cwhfM-0001CO-Et; Sat, 08 Apr 2017 04:08:00 +0000
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 21:07:59 -0700
Message-ID: <m2shljpmn4.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
Cc: ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Fw: [Int-area] IETF 98 Minutes
In-Reply-To: <AM4PR0401MB22414069AFBBD199F585B055BD0C0@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAHLBt81aHb9BjDqy579mShMPcWET2nAwvd9uiM0zsnYbNLHqeg@mail.gmail.com> <AM4PR0401MB22414069AFBBD199F585B055BD0C0@AM4PR0401MB2241.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8RshskIalWg0ZZZKkZE5kJ6XNJ4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2017 04:08:06 -0000

>> IPv6 was 1995 not 1998.
> 
> Then we should blame the ietf and the IPv6 authors for the wrong
> information listed in the IPv6 RFC 2460.
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2460.txt

if it is indeed erronious, we would call it an "erratum" not "blame."

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email