Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Mon, 27 June 2022 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0DFC15AAE6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:16:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.852
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.852 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.745, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QuX7Xs2ukO0G for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F5CAC15AADE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25REL3Iu006447; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:16:46 +0100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=ZvXi+5wi9kUNx3LLdu+vsGflWxgySJzFUAN8TKe1UhM=; b=Z4TS5KAfph7RNieKFJ1QPDeVWAi7s+sAH4nJfM2gYxiQun8A6wzMf6LmRQoU18rYQX+j amNiTtszN0279u+/dh33UsMyNDa6qh1XtO5lbVQb9ryMGKXqRUzo842riE1PvbiTVzLS 1Ca24XpMzShPUJWXCzStFHlFBWqobq5953K4DPsQ5j1VMI7s1LhIp0/sgGaLE29s5rwx VJF0ge3nX2u2mbQjXOeIWvbxQSIU7jKz6+xIgphCbMoQXIziCcQIc+BUYFo+cWI1fCsM 4I2jGWgFSrjYps6qAR5SfbdeEJ65/g5OYL742ZwIswb2+uVELvLWxxkVQRAOu0YCPTCE fg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (a72-247-45-33.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.33] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gwtsc2311-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 18:16:45 +0100
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.17.1.5/8.17.1.5) with ESMTP id 25RG7q1e012730; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:16:45 -0400
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.202]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 3gxmvvwq08-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:16:45 -0400
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.50.203) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.986.26; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:16:44 -0700
Received: from ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) by ustx2ex-dag4mb4.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.50.203]) with mapi id 15.02.0986.026; Mon, 27 Jun 2022 10:16:44 -0700
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG
Thread-Topic: Post-Last-Call versions of documents and change logs: suggestion to the IESG
Thread-Index: AQHYiLOuxk4S+F+zWU6FKVLYU7+Geq1hEsGAgAAWmwCAAorfgA==
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:16:44 +0000
Message-ID: <7609D78E-39C0-47DD-9A1B-7D2126FC8E60@akamai.com>
References: <ED90C87AEF388AB3BF7CABCF@PSB> <d92b60a6-22a0-1790-2c1d-adf27e95a19d@gmail.com> <5e7888ed-5acc-36d3-e148-1c253366cebc@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <5e7888ed-5acc-36d3-e148-1c253366cebc@network-heretics.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.61.22050700
x-originating-ip: [172.27.118.139]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <692EB410ADC1454FB79423EEAA416FFB@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-06-27_06,2022-06-24_01,2022-06-22_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=774 spamscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206270070
X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: -x47lbWfyLfZXvdwQhJP7kcxxIcNWdMW
X-Proofpoint-GUID: -x47lbWfyLfZXvdwQhJP7kcxxIcNWdMW
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.205,Aquarius:18.0.883,Hydra:6.0.517,FMLib:17.11.122.1 definitions=2022-06-27_06,2022-06-24_01,2022-06-22_01
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=747 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 mlxscore=0 clxscore=1015 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2204290000 definitions=main-2206270071
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8Tvz79k04c89fh1tqCiLq6ORZeM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2022 17:16:52 -0000

>    I don't think so.  What the ADs consider substantive and what the 
    community considers substantive may be different.

For what it's worth, in the various groups I've co-chaired, I have pushed changes back to the WG for review when I thought they were non-editorial changes that needed confirmation.  So WG chairs can do it in addition to Ads.