IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: tone policing

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Mon, 09 September 2019 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107621201EA for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h83DrScQHlOi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 706DD120098 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 09:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B862012F; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:50:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 Sep 2019 12:50:00 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=9/SgloD5r7J2r5WgfHRWBJGuOguUZyXcebWEFnvdR 2A=; b=FPHqJKYvuowhT6DVBp30NcrEZ/msdyChmv5VscoQRecnzljU9CkTFzOL4 x85TAYI7niwdeCqHmJXXEbi9kSaSEwqFEk1qLXxtxyOBDhisesQgeWYdPtnZ4eUe BpYmz3+s4cpnIqvUZWNBNKvNZ1/2PwOFx/1AdcEZDgIfyetrDvpxpAzudQHKe5Cp hK+d98CbOzgpxmwSU0K2jLL440MmE6jg/wkRaQVyQrOBOXKIkYIDRpzeh7OC2SXv lHczT9ICczBK7l+8j3aqf3t4trjvwoVFdaZvaLqti6Z2BnNXLKcgho9yE05teae4 F1z+qleVnKvbs7dsZr1qeTzrZEjqQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:t4J2XQ4dXE0U2qbOdxQLAvXoNNQv162iIVCHUhgzKTNU5z3jDj3RmQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudekiedguddtgecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvfhfhkffffgggjggtgfesth ekredttdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihhthhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomheqnecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrd duheenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgv rhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:uIJ2XSlh6i33nfQh8d-qtZXqMyRv-HY7vXEmzlzqXuRz0dktiR1WZw> <xmx:uIJ2XdoIl4fd06Th5LI2mMqVgXKJPqTyScYNRptv0puv1gnxBY22FA> <xmx:uIJ2XZsAiPTJ0R3hvyP3yFYoUqPQIU720HUzFsC6tSpQQGWyQjuIuQ> <xmx:uIJ2XQlCOG800LXcRMWziTDE-mg-Ox26sDEm6S09HsrP5Wab7zcWqA>
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 777BB8005A; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 12:49:59 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: tone policing
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <F2D6FBAB-7DED-41AE-9560-4D0D13B15107@ericsson.com> <1BF349D9-8ABB-4844-965A-A43964E18A41@fugue.com> <29c10b3d-8f48-8888-68c9-7390b1e4df5d@network-heretics.com> <ae8353f1-adf9-c615-a721-9fba85b40d5c@foobar.org> <059707fd-afea-e4b4-fa77-967e38206c52@network-heretics.com> <737e066d-4646-7021-3466-6a66f8f0a28e@lounge.org> <259BC9E3-EE7B-4152-8BDD-3900D2D75775@network-heretics.com> <B13131F3-BFB5-4C97-B5A4-E96C34CDAB7C@akamai.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <4cc1dcb9-ae84-2cef-6439-247a5ccd41af@network-heretics.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 12:49:58 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <B13131F3-BFB5-4C97-B5A4-E96C34CDAB7C@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8YMkOqbhBoP3uDrCAUW3Q8IbYGo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 16:50:03 -0000

On 9/9/19 12:30 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:

>      >> I'm just sending replies to people arguing for censorship.   What I wonder is, why aren't more people objecting?
>
> I object to your use of the term "censorship," I find it more inflammatory than useful.
>
> The world has evolved, and what used to be acceptable is now commonly seen as less so, and as a worthwhile trade-off for more inclusivity.  You seem opposed to the IETF doing this, or do I misunderstand you?

You misunderstand me.    I do not object to trying to be more inclusive, 
but I strongly object to imposing arbitrary, poorly-defined constraints 
on IETF contributions.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email