IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: e2e [was: Non routable IPv6 registry proposal]

Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com> Sun, 24 January 2021 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <hallam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC3E3A0CF5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:18:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TSyZGp1LOnJs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:18:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-f174.google.com (mail-yb1-f174.google.com [209.85.219.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E1C53A0C7E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:18:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-f174.google.com with SMTP id e67so11556363ybc.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:18:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1fyDXEv7p64mu6zALo//xocxfFdD0zsENNveHj9kKyU=; b=czYDEHoQ6Zmj42x6iSl/me7n1kaW201XoA94thN6XBhXE7l2lMbLAFX3HGhv4R67O7 F1FNppfDCXmE5S4/jSvw+/vYPn+l9AjZQH2tgfSOgJxxlzjtEV3kX7GvoQ7kqmn52VXl GDXplv+H9FNCrgq3V1k5sf5b/X82Ho/s5xW2jqqEGTnvzIpuIKanHBCOIR+nrkPlxic8 q8UI/995m0bWC2JCMXQH1BvR37nxCLbOR1CwT23YeBN3t1a7H2AhcEpooNAJeebUfztV mDX0siTAayc/Iwuj9ZDHhuj8871ohRhOVjogygbKDAw8vVWt0noqE5wWGoIKLhBFvW2C qA3A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532GvFRsyP7gsRSYBBMvyWtDvVPk//YBldoRKfTTMxoIYuZzQNlR hhHzCtRq020oKGBCp9ckprJf0T22qHDRDyE765c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydswL0+IxRE0cqW9Tp1Ku3jRwbjnJCdHBSoB5p9zc3Mc9wVD3kGZ9IbTD5+p9/2xB04fFiFcY7XTgMIQpApOE=
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:444:: with SMTP id s4mr21985224ybp.172.1611530315584; Sun, 24 Jan 2021 15:18:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMm+LwjNiE0P7RAVqzKMypNbh3=9BeqiWn_hGv3E=zX7-YmSXQ@mail.gmail.com> <72F969A9-AF94-47B6-B48C-B3CD4D9A7C72@strayalpha.com> <7cc9e38c-5a00-ec59-a8c2-10503cc40d50@si6networks.com> <CB1A6DF0-8CDD-495D-9F7B-80BF72F08C1E@strayalpha.com> <53d7190a-3e1f-66b3-0574-8e8fbb3a7a5e@si6networks.com> <6d2f587f-6b8a-dfe0-04cd-cc66fcdf44dd@gmail.com> <A2818404-57C1-4D4F-A077-D6CE1985482E@strayalpha.com>
In-Reply-To: <A2818404-57C1-4D4F-A077-D6CE1985482E@strayalpha.com>
From: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 18:18:23 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMm+Lwiq-g9pFWpJiTB+AkOWObeh7bNN+0JTiWxOw9Uv7SP_Dw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: e2e [was: Non routable IPv6 registry proposal]
To: Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000015b3505b9ada4e8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8YWvzEX2TF1tvOR7JCgP8MknKNg>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2021 23:18:38 -0000

I will accept that end to end is absolutely the only valid way to move
packets when someone shows me how to defeat DoS attacks with an endpoint
approach.

People should read the paper. It is not the dogmatic, ideological statement
some folk seem to imagine. And even if it were, it isn't holy scripture.
And even if it were, when did this become a religion?

E2E is simply a pragmatic argument that keeping complexity out of the
center of the inter-network has certain advantages. But Internet protocols
have never been pure E2E. Anyone who thinks that hasn't been paying
attention.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status