Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Wed, 09 July 2008 14:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BF53A6AB3; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8CF3A6AB3 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VrZnKPCy5tnI for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585993A6950 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:18:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pool-71-106-110-19.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.106.110.19]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m69EIOGf016678 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 9 Jul 2008 07:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4874C8AE.6090101@isi.edu>
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 07:18:22 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Andrews <Mark_Andrews@isc.org>
Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
References: <200807090514.m695EeAX082124@drugs.dv.isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <200807090514.m695EeAX082124@drugs.dv.isc.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU>, Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1748488956=="
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org


Mark Andrews wrote:
...
>>> 	"hk" is not a legal fully qualified host name.
>> Agreed. "hk.", however, is.
> 
> 	No, it is not a legal hostname. 
> 
> 	RFC 952 explicitly excludes trailing periods.

RFC 952 is not a standard.

Joe

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf