IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [alto] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08

"Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 08 May 2017 22:52 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B0A127078 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 15:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.002
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.002 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=ietf@kuehlewind.net header.d=kuehlewind.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wwyu_k2nXZwb for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 15:52:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kuehlewind.net (kuehlewind.net [83.169.45.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 230611200FC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 15:52:55 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=kuehlewind.net; b=N9xJ4hnwmzrqrN18QcxoFGPfPG7tBB81qzYkfr1RD5CbY64f3Z1UxX4s7dpfMFsjj0iulaY8XL8CQYsQsIkF/2a6HFIrTvogqoOPaAHrqakePJHu8wOxW5wbTqjJkKZkvyK5TaqxuWI8vX8MCnh/OvTcJUw9p5PJge/hbENyUV8=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-PPP-Message-ID:X-PPP-Vhost;
Received: (qmail 1211 invoked from network); 9 May 2017 00:45:32 +0200
Received: from p5dec259c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO ?192.168.178.33?) (93.236.37.156) by kuehlewind.net with ESMTPSA (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted, authenticated); 9 May 2017 00:45:32 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: [alto] Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08
From: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUiyvokXWbgWFp96in3=Ge5PUhoKjNNZpxhykaMTyxQ-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2017 00:45:31 +0200
Cc: "art@ietf.org" <art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost.all@ietf.org>, "alto@ietf.org" <alto@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <61DA787B-0E86-4343-88F6-5EF03ABA274A@kuehlewind.net>
References: <149144445494.22036.11923880719369865745@ietfa.amsl.com> <DB6PR0701MB24543D95D78557DDEACA2D71951E0@DB6PR0701MB2454.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnWAn9r4ZGtVq6yLyYcC7w5rDy4dV+98q0K__Nnm2UfRew@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0701MB2459B2173C921635A61CC24695100@HE1PR0701MB2459.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <2A376548-9BB0-4D7B-81C6-1BD951227FEA@kuehlewind.net> <CABkgnnUiyvokXWbgWFp96in3=Ge5PUhoKjNNZpxhykaMTyxQ-A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-PPP-Message-ID: <20170508224532.1197.62492@lvps83-169-45-111.dedicated.hosteurope.de>
X-PPP-Vhost: kuehlewind.net
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8dtX1vb-FTdBgpyCkMNHhLi07QI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 22:52:58 -0000

Thanks!

> Am 09.05.2017 um 00:39 schrieb Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>:
> 
> Yes, I believe that the changes made were sufficient.
> 
> On 8 May 2017 at 22:15, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) <ietf@kuehlewind.net> wrote:
>> Hi Martin,
>> 
>> just to double check: do you think this document is ready now and all your comments have been addressed?
>> 
>> Mirja
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 27.04.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com>:
>>> 
>>> Hello Martin,
>>> 
>>> I just posted an update where the " Requirements Language" text has been moved in a section 1.1.
>>> As I saw it on a number of other ietf drafts, I also added the sentence
>>> "When the words appear in lower case, their natural language meaning is used."
>>> 
>>> The update and status are available at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost/
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sabine
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com]
>>>>> Sent: 26 April 2017 08:39
>>>>> To: Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay) <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-
>>>>> bell-labs.com>
>>>>> Cc: art@ietf.org; alto@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-alto-multi-
>>>>> cost.all@ietf.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: Artart telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-multi-cost-08
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 26 April 2017 at 03:26, Randriamasy, Sabine (Nokia - FR/Nozay)
>>>>> <sabine.randriamasy@nokia-bell-labs.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> This document doesn't cite RFC 2119, but it uses the keywords.
>>>>>> [SR     ] RFC 2119 is cited on page 1, section " Requirements Language" and
>>>>> section "9.1.  Normative References". Should it be referenced elsewhere?
>>>>> 
>>>>> The convention is to put those in the body, I missed it in the boilerplate.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I skimmed the other changes, and they look fine.
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> alto mailing list
> alto@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/alto

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email