Re: IPv6-only IETF web server for publishing an Internet Draft?

Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com> Mon, 14 May 2018 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C5912E76A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2018 06:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9JoaSflk-X_e for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 May 2018 06:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.kot-begemot.co.uk (ivanoab5.miniserver.com [78.31.111.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 885851270A7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 May 2018 06:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tun5.smaug.kot-begemot.co.uk ([192.168.18.6] helo=smaug.kot-begemot.co.uk) by www.kot-begemot.co.uk with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>) id 1fIDbi-000595-Cr for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 14 May 2018 13:33:42 +0000
Received: from amistad.kot-begemot.co.uk ([192.168.3.89]) by smaug.kot-begemot.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>) id 1fIDbi-0007IB-0v for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 14 May 2018 14:33:42 +0100
Subject: Re: IPv6-only IETF web server for publishing an Internet Draft?
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <fcee1ad8-255c-5619-1945-bab24c95ca89@gmail.com> <6c352737-991e-c4c2-a104-e7ebfe548009@forfun.net> <4E469EA123CE8A23BCF57C77@PSB>
From: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Organization: Cambridge Greys Limited
Message-ID: <2bac0d07-df38-edd6-0c06-feeae07f4b7d@cambridgegreys.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 14:33:27 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4E469EA123CE8A23BCF57C77@PSB>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8k7ipa_UKgevL6vtyeT3td7zlDM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 13:33:52 -0000


On 05/04/18 12:48, John C Klensin wrote:
> Personal opinion only...
>
> A key part of the intent of Internet Drafts is that they be
> generally available to anyone interested on the Internet.  I
> understand the motivations for experiments and demonstrations
> but, if something is posted that is deliberately inaccessible to
> someone who cannot not or will not use IPv6, it invalidates the
> function of the document as a generally-accessible I-D and
> presumably could result in a process problem (or appeal) if
> there were any attempt to move it into an IETF consensus process.
>
> Please do demonstrations and experiments in another way.

+1

On the difference of Draft vs Rant.

A draft is submitted via the IETF website, versioned, subject to the 
restrictions described in the relevant RFCs and processes and accessible 
to THE ENTIRE INTERNET COMMUNITY via the ietf website.

Something restricted by the author based on arbitrary criteria and 
accessible via an arbitrary mechanism is a rant.

This is regardless of the mechanism being NetBIOS, IPX, RFC1149 or 
RFC2549. All are equally good for ranting and selective presentation 
only to the chosen ones.

So if ranting is desired, the rantee can go and rant wherever he/she 
likes over whatever protocol he/she likes, it is not an IETF, IETF WG or 
IETF mailing list matter.

A.

>
>      john
>
>
> --On Friday, May 4, 2018 11:37 +0200 "Marco Davids (Private)"
> <mdavids@forfun.net> wrote:
>
>> On 04/05/2018 10:16, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Is there an ietf.org web server that could be accessed only
>>> on IPv6?
>>>
>>> I would like to submit an Internet Draft but I want it to be
>>> read only with IPv6 https (not IPv4).
>> Make sure it is *truly* IPv6 only for additional fun. So, the
>> name servers should also only have AAAA records.
>>
>> An example of what I mean can be found here:
>> https://dnslabs.nl/
>>
>> And speaking of IPv6 fun; I still like http://42.be/ quite a
>> lot.
>
>
>
>

-- 
Anton R. Ivanov

Cambridge Greys Limited, England and Wales company No 10273661
http://www.cambridgegreys.com/