Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-08

Jouni Korhonen <> Thu, 29 December 2016 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82491295C1; Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:37:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jouni Korhonen <>
To: <>
Subject: Review of draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-08
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.40.3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:37:02 -0800
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 11:37:03 -0000

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review result: Ready

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-availability-extension-??
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review Date: 2016-12-29
IETF LC End Date: 2016-10-24
IESG Telechat date: 2017-02-16

Summary: Ready for publication.

Major issues: None.

Minor issues: None.

Nits/editorial comments: 

I reviewed -07 version of the document. The issue I raised back then
has been addressed in an adequate level.
There are still editorial nits in the document like:

* Section 2:
   "include a< availability, bandwidth> information list in its OSPF"
   where the "a<" is somewhat confusing..
* Section 2:
   "node(s).The setup"
   which misses a space. 

However, these nits and alike can be corrected by the RFC Editor.