Re: Concerns about Singapore

Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org> Fri, 08 April 2016 03:58 UTC

Return-Path: <chopps@chopps.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59AAD12D792 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 20:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cXc0-07xlLUO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 20:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.chopps.org (smtp.chopps.org [54.88.81.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C4A12D783 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 20:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (24-247-68-31.dhcp.trcy.mi.charter.com [24.247.68.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by smtp.chopps.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C35D96115C; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 03:58:42 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Concerns about Singapore
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_22240C40-490B-4EA6-9991-98B377163753"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: Christian Hopps <chopps@chopps.org>
In-Reply-To: <A9B63A6D-3102-482F-8FFC-2E57A5FD8336@nic.cz>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 23:58:41 -0400
Message-Id: <CC16B445-2B74-4182-BC58-F9D4BFFA1CCF@chopps.org>
References: <0D914666-C3D4-4CCE-AD5E-4E5B34EA1A73@piuha.net> <20160407182936.GA21340@pfrc.org> <CAB75xn780nNDjGa_Cc222J20-+1CCHt09Xp8KHzaK=n0xx51pg@mail.gmail.com> <5706B100.9040509@mnt.se> <CAB75xn6fmj84ROUtG5eUB3GerHx83hrEr3w5vSADY_g=BRg5FA@mail.gmail.com> <5706BA40.3060005@mnt.se> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604072157240.31096@uplift.swm.pp.se> <A9B63A6D-3102-482F-8FFC-2E57A5FD8336@nic.cz>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8v-3upHxoCRHiQow38dLsYiyEh0>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 03:58:45 -0000

> On Apr 7, 2016, at 4:08 PM, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>; wrote:
> 
> Right. And since Leif mentioned censorship, let me note that IETF already held a meeting in a country where censorship, and Internet censorship in particular, is commonplace.

I actually did not attend that meeting for this very reason. I am very proud to be a part of IETF and the open and inclusive process in which we work. I found it very odd, and disheartening that this site was chosen, and skipped it in protest.

Chris.