Re: And so it begins? SPF failure on self

S Moonesamy <> Mon, 31 October 2016 07:07 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4002812953C for <>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:07:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.287
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.287 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.b=dTmxU7Jn; dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.b=39kZGCpM
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NAwDPTAN0uFn for <>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4D7129554 for <>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:07:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([]) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u9V77RMb017304 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1477897661; x=1477984061; bh=K2m1WYIZ0jdrXrWXno2KhYNvOXZ7nDlCeLLIoFBZtMQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=dTmxU7JnEjzzNA7nuepAFrtNr/lJHx5pjvK6oGnNpUtaZhcWophzjEBtM2BfVnSQZ 6PSvjTVsNXiA6RUr3L8Q8/tVk3oUTD6SF40GyhWcxbL1kPr2U6cDGOr1xvmqdGsX/u eUA+oyOB3UcFYDNKX4SNoh0PwVH4MJB2NoqQrrzQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1477897661; x=1477984061;; bh=K2m1WYIZ0jdrXrWXno2KhYNvOXZ7nDlCeLLIoFBZtMQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=39kZGCpM0AHbCIVNcc+pRAT9FoOgF0BbAKvYBsyviPhLAnogKbYA8eXTHvy4ewZ7W RgyQ99D8LLzQLllKxZHl9CKpu8XlVcofTUDDS7SoJZlrnDAsvn+qpX5oWVxELZOG3Z jf5ZinQwlxYmJJ8ea2vJmR5X9RcxVVue3ZTa/e+0=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 00:06:09 -0700
To: Paul Wouters <>
From: S Moonesamy <>
Subject: Re: And so it begins? SPF failure on self
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <>, Christian Huitema <>,
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 07:07:52 -0000

Hi Paul,

For information about the facilitators experiment, please see

At 21:42 27-10-2016, Paul Wouters wrote:
>Using my address, I replied to a draft alias email address
>that includes myself, and the ietf mail server rejected the message
>to me (or at least I hope the others still got it)
>Is this a new mail "feature" or did something on my
>end change?

I suggest opening a ticket about the above by sending a message to

S. Moonesamy