Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options

Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Tue, 28 September 2004 12:14 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA16626; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:14:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCH0Z-0008Di-Kf; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:23:04 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCGnb-0003HO-Jo; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:09:39 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCGjs-0002tO-37 for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:05:48 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA15990 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:05:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([158.38.152.233]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCGrg-0007zx-0a for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 08:13:53 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3964E61BAD; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:05:15 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from eikenes.alvestrand.no ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eikenes.alvestrand.no [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21657-01; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:05:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from halvestr-w2k02.emea.cisco.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eikenes.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CED61A93; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:05:12 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:39:59 +0200
From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <616A0E5C17EF10EF9D4736AE@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
In-Reply-To: <454DCF8DE6D4C10F82E806E7@scan.jck.com>
References: <2004927153921.674789@bbprime> <C4A184C3B6756B0AD785E11A@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126> <454DCF8DE6D4C10F82E806E7@scan.jck.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.5 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at alvestrand.no
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9ed51c9d1356100bce94f1ae4ec616a9
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

John,

what I expected when I caused this poll to be created was that there would 
be a significant number of people choosing "No, I do not wish to state an 
opinion". For multiple reasons - "I trust the leadership to decide better 
than I can" was one that people talking to me gave me, in addition to all 
the ones you mention below.

So the number of people who chose this option was real information to me 
(in something approaching the Shannon sense... information is the amount of 
surprise you get....)

Of course, this poll also suffers from the fallacy that we are looking at 
both the turnout and the distribution of answers before the poll closes, 
thus influencing potential pollees..... I won't say more about my 
interpretation of the poll before the announced "close date" (Wednesday).

                          Harald


--On 28. september 2004 07:27 -0400 John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> 
wrote:

> To combine "I don't have an opinion", "I don't think the options
> provided here even approximately represents my opinion", "I have
> an opinion but am fearful about telling you", "this discussion
> has been so confusing that I have no way to decide", I don't
> choose to spend my time worrying about things like this", is
> tricky business, however unintentionally.  Doing so with a
> single question identified as "No, I do not wish to state an
> opinion" makes it worse in some ways.   At a minimum, one should
> be extremely careful in interpreting answers to that sort of
> question.  And one should be equally careful in interpreting any
> of the other answers if this option gets non-trivial answers.





_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf