IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: The TCP and UDP checksum algorithm may soon need updating

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> Sun, 07 June 2020 23:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mike@fresheez.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991333A053E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:16:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.651
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.651 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gyJdIKb3N_3X for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9ED7B3A0538 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id m2so5209141pjv.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 16:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mtcc-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=mJVzmEUrgHsPqTycQu0qte0wsXVvWfhW8QugJOzyhzo=; b=HlBUsvArFOzcfBFQGBinFFErrZ7YPsDxbtjV46L9YtIR3/I5smDO4LZ9hU18FKWBg9 HXQh/YVZeYWvN44NNdWNwQQDQqCHga2PZ+0sSomrFS6mJnOPrjw9Jc6alhWBu7hgHUAZ xkF9vYNETbhqCnFfzIgttHdhY7tf1A3qDGW6cNTzGm06HJ70Pn6zUcxdWRuHBHDk0fph SnVgJ4eIGQgE16pdcqfrk1g373eFaPrhfimK3QFgeGESt2Jaa1/266lozTwS8HKiw6Cr EexWqBSI7Fr3CQwo0wYBZB7m+D/pQ9yGcoxB2rUxpPsn9laEobIkiaqq6zkNB12n0iaC SruA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=mJVzmEUrgHsPqTycQu0qte0wsXVvWfhW8QugJOzyhzo=; b=lTkomTAnmValui7dIdi/epz6CC1kktJDUvax3W1skJgl6ukP4ykMgPjZVkfsqneOrW ruGTIdkOsujfUGSVTrp03zianmagvBVzVMazWN97cxP9SAn+XyLM0aNyXPK5XtIF8nJj QL/wNxcvmla0EpKH8VJ4g0O7TTZ3xZPVMWvXWr94RzK8badooYC+3nFSf8ti/1vdj+s7 fAewH+fttrJQYVRkK+HKMRBaVvTcUoWk5jvGGSCftdDxVAcpU9/sZ8oO8R+3JgvNRFYv mTDcVISewYQNxkuSzG/OcDAjl0WQ19L+0eqbMUYW/KTet9W/2sciv4Vg1/ofrIxrahDJ 9sBw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531M/A1w/ltsCD4KAyMbBeG0JpttTXYxdPa5O5Tp/YhrEAvqSSuS kQwiRaBNKwOCZejeBrHJYX+aTVvmzsY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJykRng9xAA9Z+s8OkjssFpT5/CgwbpLtIrRgHXA0mnOAdwnCLAlo59A8hkg53PyebD71kvoKg==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1495:: with SMTP id js21mr14289083pjb.48.1591571808657; Sun, 07 Jun 2020 16:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MichaelsMacBook.lan (107-182-45-85.volcanocom.com. [107.182.45.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j15sm13655128pjj.12.2020.06.07.16.16.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 07 Jun 2020 16:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: The TCP and UDP checksum algorithm may soon need updating
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Joseph Touch <touch@strayalpha.com>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <28A2725D-00F8-4739-8A73-ED176F8EF561@strayalpha.com> <3AA98081-A70E-4076-8096-79FFAEE8A738@huitema.net> <830b91c4-0bb5-af5b-f7b8-c5edd43dc87e@mtcc.com> <4512C1BF-5722-479B-8506-24018610BEAD@strayalpha.com> <5b4ea5ea-e2d6-1a01-3676-dd2a72dbd2c1@mtcc.com> <2C425F1E-2E12-4E47-ACEC-AF4C4A93FA3E@akamai.com>
From: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Message-ID: <140429ad-af8b-e03f-a641-1e78b6056fa4@mtcc.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 16:16:46 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <2C425F1E-2E12-4E47-ACEC-AF4C4A93FA3E@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/8xNYKvdvLy7PGk35rMt6wVl8l-s>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Jun 2020 23:16:51 -0000

On 6/7/20 3:54 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:
>>     That's my point: TLS leaves the transport layer unprotected.
> Why do you say that?
>
>
Because the TCP headers aren't part of the hmac digest? Am I missing 
something?

Mike

v2.1.27 | Report a Bug | By Email