Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6225012D1AD;
 Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:52:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.448
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.448 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548]
 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
 by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id vWTKzSDMDdZv; Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7613212D16F;
 Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:52:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mbp-2.local ([IPv6:2601:1c0:cb00:5d1a:f594:3376:459a:acdf])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u7VGqtIZ073885
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT);
 Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:52:55 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: nagasaki.bogus.com: Host
 [IPv6:2601:1c0:cb00:5d1a:f594:3376:459a:acdf] claimed to be mbp-2.local
Subject: Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
References: <0371ee99-778c-5ded-0c31-3c6d8d6b55c7@nostrum.com>
 <6600b98c-e677-d198-4e0f-68fff3ee8e3c@bogus.com>
 <4C3AB846-15D8-4211-95D3-9593AA5F21F6@piuha.net>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <1fec63f4-340e-74a6-1dea-36977d95e718@bogus.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 09:52:55 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:47.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/47.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4C3AB846-15D8-4211-95D3-9593AA5F21F6@piuha.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="xWuasC588TlsuUPxT2OvLqeLf8jkrtxgj"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9-TwP_UanMHqSR7eEXUAMFsnzWw>
Cc: dnsop@ietf.org, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>,
 draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds.all@ietf.org, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>,
 <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>,
 <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 16:52:58 -0000

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--xWuasC588TlsuUPxT2OvLqeLf8jkrtxgj
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="51UGRP2UocII5VCOFGu7l6SiPp6BQGMbX"
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Cc: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org"
 <ietf@ietf.org>, dnsop@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds.all@ietf.org
Message-ID: <1fec63f4-340e-74a6-1dea-36977d95e718@bogus.com>
Subject: Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03
References: <0371ee99-778c-5ded-0c31-3c6d8d6b55c7@nostrum.com>
 <6600b98c-e677-d198-4e0f-68fff3ee8e3c@bogus.com>
 <4C3AB846-15D8-4211-95D3-9593AA5F21F6@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C3AB846-15D8-4211-95D3-9593AA5F21F6@piuha.net>

--51UGRP2UocII5VCOFGu7l6SiPp6BQGMbX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

yeah I reached back out to robert on 8/17, I don't think there has been
closure yet so the scheduled iesg discussion may be premature.

joel

On 8/30/16 5:24 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Robert =97 thanks for the review (again)! And thanks everyone for a doc=
ument that to me seems quite useful and necessary.
>
> I do have a similar concern as Robert did, however, in making sure that=
 the change to 7344 is properly highlighted. Joel, did you have a plan on=
 how to make that happen? I haven=92t seen any IETF list traffic on the l=
ast call since June=85
>
> For what it is worth, I have today reviewed both draft-ietf-dnsop-maint=
ain-ds and RFC 7344, and personally find the recommendations and actions =
reasonable.
>
> Jari
>



--51UGRP2UocII5VCOFGu7l6SiPp6BQGMbX--

--xWuasC588TlsuUPxT2OvLqeLf8jkrtxgj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlfHC2cACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrI4ZQCfUxZ2K/4aFxfnZSmhQs2twc4P
bTsAn1LQ3N7ig0dp6rsVkQxhdQrytjMI
=0i8g
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--xWuasC588TlsuUPxT2OvLqeLf8jkrtxgj--

