IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF chair's blog

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Mon, 25 February 2013 01:24 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC9121F918C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:24:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.467
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_IP_ADDR=1.119, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y4z3AaYdXBgn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:24:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3700E21F918B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:24:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [203.126.139.29] (unknown [111.223.96.126]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE3B308445; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:23:48 -0200 (UYST)
References: <1BBAE003-DEA4-462A-998D-863F6FF90A69@ietf.org> <51298B1E.60007@lacnic.net> <512A5A10.4090406@acm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <512A5A10.4090406@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8A832DDC-1D5E-4C1B-87BB-36A384937480@lacnic.net>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B141)
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
Subject: Re: IETF chair's blog
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:21:52 +0800
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 01:24:01 -0000

Why not?

I, my organization and many more (included ISOC) have found them very useful for outreach activities. I do not see why the IETF shouldn't. Please, tell me.


as

Sent from my iPad

On 25 Feb 2013, at 02:21, Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> On 02/23/2013 07:38 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
>> 
>> Very good initiative.
>> 
>> Twitter, Google+, Facebook, etc. could be the next steps. Let's embrace new
>> tools to collaborate.
> 
> Let's not.  Collaboration based on software running on servers run by the IETF
> or a contractor payed by the IETF is fine.  Using collaboration tools owned by
> the entities you listed, or similar entities, is not.
> 
>> 
>> Regards, as
>> 
>> On 22/02/2013 20:35, IETF Chair wrote:
>>> Jari has created a blog as an experiment to see if would be possible to 
>>> provide periodic status reports and other thoughts from the chair.
>>> Here's the link:
>>> 
>>> http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/02/chairs-blog/
> 
> 
> - -- 
> Marc Petit-Huguenin
> Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
> Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
> Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJRKloIAAoJECnERZXWan7EOMQP/05jtr5JVAQVZJJlP/At7cOx
> wEYxU5Z/v5wn21m0BfCqnfFxXhAOP+/vGje785gS+GPZZktnWffQu7JN0TNny8Rn
> U4nhgA19x7wdtz0jtTAV92JF4pEI2ZZ8uv74EoLzCobFW+biAy5jJM9mGFy+MqKB
> tuXIQpYc5dDRxmQe8szGWoVw6+ycGLfsHgZdeOZGhjPO7cSwnYboQ5w5/4WIhpe/
> Pd9hTvsig0D6dBB3Dwl+rC8T0lzP4+yqHgfF6Y7+kS0rjToWdbA1R87GVxtVip1q
> 08HL8DGRicfrxVrpezvQOO3D5aNjbe3tdu3zyff5jZHMg19OLPvM9hE66sFBSuHp
> 5pLt2jdTceG5BIwSc0u6+cIbGxFTVTO1+aU86K7SPzxlWNryWbDpPStUKszl7X9h
> 8fu7a4A5Jd1o5BgqIqtDNrLbdtrMP4p0emuLOaTA2GayQqfMi3tDlhgzHAF1jgpS
> osWxUOhK6kaM441lFr9eJ/fTX130WnreDHoBhh3Fu090jukNZGBwqnSLkFrkqANO
> L/4u0Q3YchSvh/NQO4d/mEha+y7vQ202shsT4cgm6OsiPYe5iCoPuPbFlexpPF8m
> DQvoOyFjMmyJzpaEkzO0PBXYhgLEIynx/O7vq89/4R3SDU96t+aHnl5nxGmS/NDb
> L8j1K0cpZ12CfCaGQevT
> =4P1+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status