Re: Quality of Directorate reviews

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 06 November 2019 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA37120089 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:04:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQ540RAoMW0H for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:04:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm1-x335.google.com (mail-wm1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A5EE120072 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:04:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm1-x335.google.com with SMTP id t26so4282703wmi.4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 09:04:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=Os5U+FX9lF54e0cqOPZWBALb4Cg1O9PXLdzPrMnGQWQ=; b=RLU9JPGZmLHBZBR20aNSI1IjJKrFzk1u5VY1Xu6EssuwDTbDFWDM2rQ1pGeq0PUVSb ujj1txIabfBqStJJXQAdFJRIhCupo8MTeJEQdd4iWE4b+T56eu+BNqC2f9PdE9Laa09Y 2RGczn7Al1tdiZWQZi4lBvjy5dzFkDbg96XBS06nSCp6HDVvTH+sg//OkOi1POUW8lCJ Z6N7FAmynLqeNXPIhoCHz2Zi5i05MRdFEbXT/THZrzULSgPN4ial7G4KAsZj7+uk3z/5 Fhd2va0RZn80lQxRB564WBUP+DIDuF25gNvPi+8e/zGxGzmezzJwZ+y+Z3OrcIFe5MEc ulrw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=Os5U+FX9lF54e0cqOPZWBALb4Cg1O9PXLdzPrMnGQWQ=; b=uB6jbJgRmxCv4QZwwJbvx5fdnB14m4RhogurnFk/UMnAk3XvmEyHKBOJJtyZUzbITr g+qp0GLjVYU/xB6e1Jp91QyAFWwjGy8duUam6iSm8z8h2VxCjyK/XlbVmm+AJD1XETBC sihha96gU587TPmRTmYIiL34QAEIY0/CLdZ8matJ8iOrcRLhJMUzVMKSp9nXXCCMhv1J V5kBcnOPRKd320dGHFQvtrNHtGf181Km/KK5B98Pa6qy8v74IbHrKCfyVJ8zJYeoOMyu tfH3CGCuUfEU227lMfaBY0FnU7GuvPpMBGGpjAA2MZORlyPIvv0pQpnIFhhhCoQLurA/ 9A4A==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUnVKB141sJH2+lcCwLKqf9GjD6g0GKEJJ7z2nZqLChZgjibR/h 8u1bw5NmT5m4IuNW6qZKkJc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzBO2Nq/5SffvpS+jZXxoWKB9je8uH/rP/+T1HlOcRkhdcf/uRIKkNPNbtuKJIG9usOfC8ODA==
X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c4c7:: with SMTP id g7mr3324944wmk.144.1573059891731; Wed, 06 Nov 2019 09:04:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:5a00:ef0b:dcc8:ba76:7e6f:8cb9? ([2601:647:5a00:ef0b:dcc8:ba76:7e6f:8cb9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v16sm26317076wrc.84.2019.11.06.09.04.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Nov 2019 09:04:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <91686B28-9583-4A8E-AF8A-E66977B1FE13@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E06787C9-2C57-486A-9BD0-7BDCF7FD1C4C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: Quality of Directorate reviews
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 09:04:45 -0800
In-Reply-To: <2C97D18E-3DA0-4A2D-8179-6D86EB835783@gmail.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <157279399807.13506.13363770981495597049.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <0EF64763-BA25-468A-B387-91445A61D318@gmail.com> <CAJU8_nUovmFmgNiYx0ez_1f+GPdU9xGViDYWfowEEomrn0pyDw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911040841160.27600@bofh.nohats.ca> <CE06CC6D-E37F-4C90-B782-D14B1D715D4B@cable.comcast.com> <38E47448-63B4-4A5D-8A9D-3AB890EBDDDD@akamai.com> <09886edb-4302-b309-9eaa-f016c4487128@gmail.com> <26819.1572990657@localhost> <2668fa45-7667-51a6-7cb6-4b704c7fba5a@isode.com> <2C97D18E-3DA0-4A2D-8179-6D86EB835783@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/97FMZ-YEo0XByRGiI7JoBjALpoo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2019 17:04:57 -0000

Ralph,

> On Nov 6, 2019, at 3:03 AM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> We shouldn't be depending on last-minute quality checks to maintain the quality of our output.  Working groups should be producing documents that are ready to publish, and develop trust that their documents are high quality.
> 

I agree.  This pushes most of the responsibility to the w.g. chairs, where IMHO it belongs.   This does scale with the number of working groups.

Bob