RE: Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

<marianne.mohali@orange.com> Fri, 27 January 2017 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <marianne.mohali@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C651296A8; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:15:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.818
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QEUedJXk7Kxi; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:15:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (mta134.mail.business.static.orange.com [80.12.70.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAAE312969C; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 09:15:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.64]) by opfednr27.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 36EFEA079E; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:15:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.19]) by opfednr00.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id EFF8A1A0077; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:15:24 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::65de:2f08:41e6:ebbe]) by OPEXCLILM44.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::b08d:5b75:e92c:a45f%18]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Fri, 27 Jan 2017 18:15:24 +0100
From: <marianne.mohali@orange.com>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12
Thread-Index: AQHSV1CHvHTQY58KVkSYsqTpbOYMOaFM0nZA
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:15:24 +0000
Message-ID: <24963_1485537325_588B802D_24963_968_1_8B970F90C584EA4E97D5BAAC9172DBB81C8C6DE3@OPEXCLILMA4.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <148186064804.24550.3460112022117949321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <148186064804.24550.3460112022117949321.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9PC-kmlHO5fuTuySmK0VAik-fbc>
Cc: "dispatch@ietf.org" <dispatch@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number.all@ietf.org" <draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number.all@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 17:15:28 -0000

Hi Joel,

I have submitted a new version (v-13) of the draft. 
I have addressed your comment for IPv6 addresses format in the example.
Concerning your major comment, the discussion is leaded by Ben.

I hope I have correctly address your comment.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number/

Best regards,
Marianne

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Joel Halpern [mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com]
> Envoyé : vendredi 16 décembre 2016 04:57
> À : gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc : ietf@ietf.org; draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-
> number.all@ietf.org; dispatch@ietf.org
> Objet : Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12
> 
> Reviewer: Joel Halpern
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> Major:
>     This document defines a new code for use in SIP, and specifies new behavior
> both for the code itself and for its use in history-info.  I am thus confused as to
> how this can be an informational RFC.  It looks like it either Proposed Standard
> or experimental.  Yes, I see that RFC 4458, which this updates is Informational.
> But just because we did it wrong before does not make that behavior correct
> now.  In addition to my understanding of the roles of different RFCs, I note that
> RFC 3969 and the IANA registry both state that this assignment must be made
> by a standards track RFC.
> 
> Minor:
>    Given our emphasis on IPv6 over IPv4, would it not make sense for the
> examples to use IPv6 addresses?  (Inspired by the Id-Nits alert.)


_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.