Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 09 September 2013 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3875121E80CE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.423
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.423 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.176, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bgSbMfRilau9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og110.obsmtp.com (exprod7og110.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.173]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A3311E815E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob110.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUi49r2Unw+qBSj0B5V/QtBUM+8Rdgluk@postini.com; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:29:19 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC8C1B8247 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:29:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96317190074; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:29:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.132]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:29:19 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
Thread-Topic: What real users think [was: Re: pgp signing in van]
Thread-Index: AQHOrZhxX0/gLXOyNUyb4mBxaqwQz5m+TOsAgAADLQCAAAKHgIAAAOeAgAACi4CAAAkVgIAAAkqA
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 21:29:18 +0000
Message-ID: <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077527DAAC@mbx-01.win.nominum.com>
References: <m2zjrq22wp.wl%randy@psg.com> <2309.1378487864@sandelman.ca> <522A5A45.7020208@isi.edu> <CA2A6416-7168-480A-8CE1-FB1EB6290C77@nominum.com> <522A71A5.6030808@gmail.com> <6DE840CA-2F3D-4AE5-B86A-90B39E07A35F@nominum.com> <CAPv4CP_ySqyEa57jUocVxX6M6DYef=DDdoB+XwmDMt5F9eGn1A@mail.gmail.com> <18992.1378676025@sandelman.ca> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077527BC7A@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <13787.1378730617@sandelman.ca> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077527C8AB@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <522E2AE4.6010908@gmail.com> <522E2C78.4050706@dcrocker.net> <F17097BC-AAD6-48EA-80D3-202DC45F7C70@shinkuro.com> <522E3141.5060609@dcrocker.net> <D47C01B0-D846-4130-9F23-8EC71E269E72@shinkuro.com> <522E3425.8070009@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130909135009.0b62cc20@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20130909135009.0b62cc20@resistor.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <826102A333ABA34680BF31AD2FD64BC8@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>, "<dcrocker@bbiw.net>" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 21:29:40 -0000

On Sep 9, 2013, at 5:21 PM, SM <sm@resistor.net> wrote:
> Yes.  Somebody would write a MUA to do it if it wasn't possible.

What they do not, however, do, is to fix up the signature so that it still validates after the editing has been done.