IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Nomcom Enhancements: Improving the IETF leadership selection process

Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Mon, 19 July 2010 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431363A6989 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:23:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.274
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.274 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id izAP-kIVZNsI for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4172D3A63C9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:23:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.19] (ppp-68-122-73-240.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.73.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o6J0NalS003063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:23:42 -0700
Message-ID: <4C439B02.9060305@dcrocker.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:23:30 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Nomcom Enhancements: Improving the IETF leadership selection process
References: <4C41D0E3.30706@dcrocker.net> <5B1A1594-0D93-4407-9493-3BE33B6E15CC@cs.ucla.edu> <4C436CD9.1060408@dcrocker.net> <A3CE6720-C9A1-473A-8DDF-F4329E14DA27@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <A3CE6720-C9A1-473A-8DDF-F4329E14DA27@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Sun, 18 Jul 2010 17:23:42 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:23:30 -0000

On 7/18/2010 5:00 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
> But those general groups, in sequence, will have a monotonically increasing
> experience with the processes and with the performance of people that are in
> those groups - someone who has pushed an ID through a working group probably
> has a better educated view of the chair than someone who has simply sat in
> the audience, and so on.


Nomcom chooses ADs, IETF Chair, IAB members and IAOC/Trust members, not working 
group chairs.

So perhaps I've missed your point.

Also, a typical author actually gets a very restricted view of the larger IETF 
management processes.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email