Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal

- If there were a database with everyone on file .
- If each person were assigned a permanent identity code .
- If block l(i.e. disconnected) letters were required .
- If persons designated as having legible handwriting wrote everything but 
the signature .

/Kim

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barry Leiba" <leiba@watson.ibm.com>
To: "Working Group Chairs" <wgchairs@ietf.org>; "IETF Discussion" 
<ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 7:19 AM
Subject: Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal


> Olaf, with a cast on his right hand, says...
>> There may be reasons to contact participants after a meeting, being able 
>> to tie
>> the name to an e-mail might be of value.
>
> I don't know what blue sheets *you* have looked at, but on the ones I've 
> seen I'd
> say that most of the scrawling looks like you dipped your cast in ink and 
> tried
> to write your email address with it.  And that you're actually 
> left-handed, as
> well.
>
> In other words, most of them are pretty illegible, benefitting neither 
> spammers
> nor those trying to make legitimate contact.
>
> I think it ain't broke.  But, really, je m'en fiche, either way.
>
> Barry
>
> _______________________________________________
> IETF mailing list
> IETF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf 

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf