IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Thu, 27 March 2008 04:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD463A6E72; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.196, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zkcXNCsctG60; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:11:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F10F28C126; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04AA93A69AD; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:11:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qmBWntqwJPAe; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 445533A69A2; Wed, 26 Mar 2008 21:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 8BCFD4482; Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:08:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF Last Call for two IPR WG Dcouments
References: <20080324200545.D6E6328C3AE@core3.amsl.com> <47E9C36E.5080405@stpeter.im> <015EC8A6374CEA1B604116AD@localhost> <47EAAEA7.2020002@stpeter.im> <47EABACC.10101@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:08:24 -0400
In-Reply-To: <47EABACC.10101@gmail.com> (Brian E. Carpenter's message of "Thu, 27 Mar 2008 10:06:20 +1300")
Message-ID: <tsld4pgstaf.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, ietf@ietf.org, ipr-wg@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

>>>>> "Brian" == Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> writes:


    Brian> Also note that appeal and recall procedures for the IAOC
    Brian> are defined in RFC 4071, and that clearly includes Trust
    Brian> actions, since the Trustees are by definition the IAOC
    Brian> members. So if the IETF doesn't like the final result,
    Brian> there is recourse.

However much less recourse than normal.  The appeal of the IAOC
decisions is intentionally fairly limited.  Honestly, I think our real
recourse if the IETF didn't agree with the trust's general policy is
to hit them over the head with a BCP.

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email