Re: [hybi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-hybi-thewebsocketprotocol-10.txt> (The WebSocket protocol) to Proposed Standard

[Scott Schmit <[e-mail]>]

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 11:36:10PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Scott Schmit wrote:
> 
> > _http._tcp.example.com. SRV 0 99 80 www.example.com.
> > _http._tcp.example.com. SRV 0 1 80 www-ds.example.com.
> > www.example.com. A 198.0.2.1
> > www-ds.example.com. A 198.0.2.2
> > www-ds.example.com. AAAA 2001:db8::2
> > 
> > I.e., content providers could control/measure their probability of
> > failure.
> 
> Are you saying content providers will actively control their probability
> of failure from 99.99%> to 99% or 99.1% (assuming 10% IPv6 deployment)
> only to promote IPv6?

I'm saying that they can be IPv6-ready without affecting their bottom
line (at least, as they perceive it). Whether they will or not--as you
point out--is another thing altogether, but at least it takes away an
often-used excuse.

Also, I've seen comments along the lines of "I want to phase in the IPv6
traffic" this allows that to happen.

-- 
Scott Schmit