Re: Alternative Proposal for Two-Stage IETF Standardization

Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net> Thu, 11 November 2010 11:22 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FF33A6A14 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:22:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.572
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.572 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.027, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jSZlCK4Q1EeV for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:22:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F11E3A69DC for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:22:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.129.69.41] (dhcp-4529.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.69.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oABBNBTL029518 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:23:19 -0800
Message-ID: <4CDBD21A.8090208@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 19:23:06 +0800
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Subject: Re: Alternative Proposal for Two-Stage IETF Standardization
References: <4CD967AD.80605@dcrocker.net> <3486.198.180.150.230.1289445298.squirrel@mail.smetech.net> <4CDB7026.5090903@dcrocker.net> <4CDB918C.8090902@dcrocker.net> <1366.198.180.150.230.1289463839.squirrel@mail.smetech.net> <4CDBCBAC.2040408@dcrocker.net> <1654.198.180.150.230.1289473837.squirrel@mail.smetech.net>
In-Reply-To: <1654.198.180.150.230.1289473837.squirrel@mail.smetech.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 11 Nov 2010 03:23:20 -0800 (PST)
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 11:22:51 -0000

On 11/11/2010 7:10 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
>
> I think it would be sufficient to say something like: The following
> implementations represent a significant Internet deployment and they are
> based on the specification in RFC<n>:
>
>    -<a>
>    -<b>
>    -<c>
>    - ...


wfm.

d/
-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net