Re: What ASN.1 got right

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Tue, 02 March 2021 18:39 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578233A0C5C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:39:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FDBGfzfo_MA0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:39:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hamster.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (hamster.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6DF73A0C83 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:39:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06506481849; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:39:08 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (100-98-118-122.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.98.118.122]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 92CC5481A9F; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 18:39:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.98.118.122 (trex/6.0.2); Tue, 02 Mar 2021 18:39:07 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Lonely-Bitter: 064166996522d4a2_1614710347843_1287483969
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1614710347843:2569441234
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1614710347843
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362297FE67; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:39:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=/DUPpwOkHy8T1F 85rY1XIzZYskA=; b=fzhpRIdSe4ZMWZYil++hB0q9HFMFCL9jmBgyps5oqSzLPU O8i8wIabqDFI4ec/wGNEJYte5v+47YrUsZWpFyfVDVGMZc2I9l0D+yX52W/OuZUT yxj1OcbadykfzEPqAHuVWd6f8KROOHkC6mHJgUs9n/SUydvV4uhAKO2Z0zhgs=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a13.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D3227EE8C; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:39:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 12:39:02 -0600
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a13
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Cc: Dirk-Willem van Gulik <dirkx@webweaving.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: What ASN.1 got right
Message-ID: <20210302183901.GV30153@localhost>
References: <20210302010731.GL30153@localhost> <0632b948-9ed1-f2bd-96da-9922ebb2aa60@mtcc.com> <006750D4-B70D-44F8-A01A-BD3AB136D9D3@webweaving.org> <a584ff73-34ae-1c9e-e746-ce98749461d7@mtcc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <a584ff73-34ae-1c9e-e746-ce98749461d7@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9layaASEKjmzlcUP1wIIgTISg9c>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 18:39:11 -0000

On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 10:19:53AM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote:
>                                                    [...] And once you rely
> on online crl's, it's all the same.

Yes, well, wherever possible we should be using short-lived credentials
and dispense with revocation.