RE: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy

"Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> Mon, 23 July 2012 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6326021F8703 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:16:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -98.629
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.629 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.923, BAYES_50=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET=1.96, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id chM-SdL4Aaii for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy10-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy10-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.39.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B3C5E21F8598 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 7203 invoked by uid 0); 23 Jul 2012 14:16:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box462.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.62) by oproxy10.bluehost.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2012 14:16:36 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:To:From; bh=miVRhVIjrZkoy2K8EqfQoVrswdHwnVzUKcdiZax0Pvc=; b=Svm/RGrn6n0vQEL5l1vE7AyGbn7klPniXiyI/pFk6KPooXISX+XZwMxjZHOJbcb/L7J+PteDeA2zpB3xcjJ7vmOvEUS28NHb7B2TtbU+yR9Tx1W+FIIVwPabSxAlLda9;
Received: from [71.191.243.130] (port=51883 helo=RSHOCKEYPC) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1StJR5-0002x4-Vk; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 08:16:36 -0600
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: 'John C Klensin' <john-ietf@jck.com>, 'IETF Administrative Director' <iad@ietf.org>
References: <20120720130733.14364.19024.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CF472A8775DF4CDEEA6A1325@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <CF472A8775DF4CDEEA6A1325@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Subject: RE: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 10:16:33 -0400
Message-ID: <009801cd68dd$c3e68ce0$4bb3a6a0$@us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac1mhZYvBZTMSVTZRoWTTaEBgglMPACV+ofQ
Content-Language: en-us
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 71.191.243.130 authed with richard@shockey.us}
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:16:58 -0000

As a working assumption let's say at least 750 USD or Euros per hour to
calculate cost recovery.  


-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John
C Klensin
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 10:40 AM
To: IETF Administrative Director
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy



--On Friday, July 20, 2012 06:07 -0700 IETF Administrative Director
<iad@ietf.org> wrote:

> The IAOC is seeking community feedback on a proposed policy by  the 
>IAOC to impose  fees to produce information and  authenticate documents 
>in response to subpoenas and  other  legal requests.
>...
> Before adopting a policy the IAOC would like feedback on this  before 
>making a  decision.  Comments appreciated to  ietf@ietf.org by 6 August 
>2012.

Seems entirely reasonable.  Knowing how much effort some of these requests
can produce, I do wonder if the fees are a bit too low but trust that the
IAOC has determined that they will at least cover costs.

   john