tools forum idea for IETF 98
Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Tue, 07 February 2017 19:30 UTC
Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57E0129E4C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:30:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id njNLe_lstUUP for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:30:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 307B8129E47 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:30:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v186so25299825wmd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:30:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ziUKuQ9Tuy2W1y6QM0eLlJacG7O0Q4gdP3yqPleCcTw=; b=K2eBz9nZrD4FWBSkCazqGx6vaSP3xCbmG/wm6DCzlBqL2m3vxyNQ/I/8nFPpNz5CmL NZ6zsRBAkKB7GX1xH+ZAAwwkLSpPB6IdLYu2UKEi+uJjovMMKaNUnBFu7lB824E1TtOk hVQW8ilwVH5nhkL3HI6GBIjPF6kEBlJxnMW+wjSDhZi4bjG5NfcARkFU5hyJmRoqTcbN 1bKouiAFBRRP5PZVVSfu4A3Yz/Tt5LHR3bgw2S3fJOnZ/6mbxKpmL8W+rdejs+JsgJPg k3ZyJK6WumMh0SH5pXwddBtgUFFu+VsBYpSrwvhGgGrfz7KL9M8V+p2IN/L3lkvTm5OQ nB0g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ziUKuQ9Tuy2W1y6QM0eLlJacG7O0Q4gdP3yqPleCcTw=; b=WT7WrK6KR/+hP55DbjDEigiOlULsau72L1LdA0fXcPM8tZg/HcufF0rJLCbyn+Ahql mKhGKnW/Xf46kTyWyfEuKX2suREpff+rUy5jxcUHWwFPPLT74iyhyUyj9uWFvBNqqg5b 4rVBfmWTCPUI47lrQk/yqbpcE0y/oHonIz6ioZyf/SiQhxD45ykgA5gPbArUDCL07sIo DxLTZlvsMt8C9/HdvlidNP7gM0zsZmQ5a7QnsU3TGf+3iCiO1l+LUtxzfG/ezJZwnOmr 1rJiLqi8i97RoLN4y1LI6xcm2LeXWH/ZnC6tNjB9ll+ptMy9iBuzNcji1eatxeznQNO/ EzAA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLyhigWKmYT8ORaNdHNBSKhW8CZNKJ6bqN656SP0rPb8NcpCdQp13ORBBBA8QuUiCPurGsFc8AxBQEbYA==
X-Received: by 10.223.146.39 with SMTP id 36mr15768123wrj.85.1486495844523; Tue, 07 Feb 2017 11:30:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.142.108 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Feb 2017 11:30:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 14:30:44 -0500
Message-ID: <CAG4d1re-o2jBJQhs+C51Xw-T1yV7UmQY86wrq0THikm6WDgQ1A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: tools forum idea for IETF 98
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0d29b4c5e7b20547f5c8be"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9poeAK-eb8rsOTixfr014HNe7_U>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 19:30:48 -0000
There have been some discussions about having a meeting at IETF 98 to discuss existing experimental tools and encourage discussion among those working on tools to handle specific issues. The basic meeting description is Tools are a critical mechanism through which IETF work can be done with less effort. Some IETF tools (e.g. datatracker, xml2rfc, etc.) are at a high level of maturity and deployment. Many other tools have either not yet reached a maturity suitable for wide-spread use or struggle to spread knowledge of their existence and use. Still other potential tools are merely partially brainstormed ideas looking for others motivated to discuss, implement and try. This meeting provides a mechanism to spread knowledge of experimental tools to those interested and get feedback on those tools. It also provides time and focus for finding others interested in particular tool ideas and discussing how to progress them. It should be augmented before IETF 98 with a wiki of experimental tool pointers and tool ideas. Agenda: 30 minutes of new tools lightning talks 60 minutes of small group discussion on different tool areas If you would be interested in doing a lightning talk for a tool which hasn't gained IETF-wide use, please let us know in the next week. If you would be interested in facilitating discussion for a particular tool area, please let us know in the next week. If you are interested in suggesting a tool area for discussion and want to be involved in that, please let us know. Once we understand what the interest level is in active participation, then we can figure out how is best to organize this. Thanks, Alia Atlas & Robert Sparks
- tools forum idea for IETF 98 Alia Atlas
- Re: tools forum idea for IETF 98 Michael Richardson
- Re: tools forum idea for IETF 98 Alia Atlas
- Re: tools forum idea for IETF 98 Phillip Hallam-Baker