Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14
Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com> Sun, 17 June 2018 06:27 UTC
Return-Path: <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D96130E7C; Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roni Even <ron.even.tlv@gmail.com>
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, opsawg@ietf.org
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-14
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.81.2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152921687734.2071.3843497811933571200@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:27:57 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9qzGT0kdaYvgCAipfn-o3BJFMMY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 06:27:58 -0000
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2018-06-16 IETF LC End Date: 2018-06-28 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is ready for publication as a standard track RFC. I was just wondering why it went from version -10 to -14 Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments:
- RE: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-… mohamed.boucadair
- Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-… Roni Even