IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IAOC] question to the IAOC: new committee members

Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Thu, 17 November 2016 02:18 UTC

Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5249E129677; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:18:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9rW2KOHG7N0B; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:18:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x229.google.com (mail-pg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 102C21294E5; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:18:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x229.google.com with SMTP id p66so85698654pga.2; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:18:16 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xtFXWwaaUjpCyGWSMmWaua7jYDwufT/PHmQpktnjEZE=; b=frU362Z92L6JiB4WAI7a5AFEr7+XWF9SjWGE9gQEscvCYSZWyfYXqXN1MpsgBT3G/U 3VCfxixI5WOSMQnSIzJ1DG7DOYXWJGDtswzbm+QdAm2L632k4jbZ3Da8B3HjgxHfYOzO R2IDakdn1sQ2xBuSSncWUHL1ajqitC/KfR82U5ZgFv8aF5ZrlcvlON+T7Rcz38+JXKSu qa44Q/DE/rOClL0GDnUotVwdQMbzAWpXh/M8vKwas0aPMXAl0pa98EqZBExRVgsNHFCP IH2EIZKnxYrFl5op/arL1SlbtaB/32x70dcxEqF3JFu0PwdlSqKOYntywL+4GhCrDg3n 9w/w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:reply-to :organization:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xtFXWwaaUjpCyGWSMmWaua7jYDwufT/PHmQpktnjEZE=; b=jP+fmW0fi8eJQZnnlCmtiQ7tFtFMY9e5mvcc9YB3hpX8s05T/12OP9hKSwXvPOrfHw cOGdZTdkCVdSMuqgfvv1jmaSM6srWiOmx41huRZoXES5bRW2CcL98iMXkOjBr5sheUBy yG1TXSyDV/CwrK6zcnMsbbyzBXamov1Hk4XgozwtstEHcM421hZCr1lxoyn6a0uRpEma LG6h92Mqxdg7AeVm4zkPlxTZorlj12HQFQuc96vIR0VJMBUsetZbQcTzFkuE134FhV63 9kZRPeRITMa75lHxjxFSF/oAmkQ52qlS65Op7s98v3WubOQixLh8sGiq9GgO7InuKebv RQbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvd4uUe4V/k3OUCcaQ1ybtSs76odtXOkm5RlFtFwrdtK4+rK3acHk2mumK9B7+Qtog==
X-Received: by 10.99.115.16 with SMTP id o16mr1753876pgc.137.1479349095698; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:18:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:8b8:d05b:29ab:c1d6? ([2001:67c:370:128:8b8:d05b:29ab:c1d6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c128sm848816pfc.39.2016.11.16.18.18.12 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:18:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: [IAOC] question to the IAOC: new committee members
To: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>, jordi.palet@consulintel.es
References: <936695FE-FC31-4C91-9D49-38C39F44207A@consulintel.es> <6d35beeb-337c-8791-5e58-a224daa65e2b@gmail.com> <5AEE86FE-E7F3-469E-966E-C10E7B1364DD@consulintel.es> <6286A351-A5A5-48A8-971F-79B5901CB887@sobco.com> <D2830076-744E-41F8-9E78-1C0E98437D52@consulintel.es> <D5283DA3-3C9E-4AB3-9788-C7E7856EBEED@sobco.com> <10D43A34-A009-41B9-8250-8C29261610DD@consulintel.es> <DB2A9F14-FF1E-4C5A-A214-8DEDA7E8D62C@sobco.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <39d8b56b-3538-4e72-9593-f14ebceb55b1@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 18:17:52 -0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DB2A9F14-FF1E-4C5A-A214-8DEDA7E8D62C@sobco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9u45NQeiwTvSahXoG9Yjxo5QQbo>
Cc: IAOC IAOC <iaoc@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2016 02:18:21 -0000

On 11/16/2016 6:13 PM, Scott O. Bradner wrote:
> I’m not sure want more we could have said in the minutes in this case


in watching this exchange, i think the model that is being demanded is 
what is called a 'fishbowl' in which every aspect of every decision 
process is fully visible to others.

in some small, tightly-knit environments, it can be viable.

the ietf is not one of those.

by way of facilitating this process, i'll suggest it be dropped, in the 
absence of something that looks like rough consensus support for 
pursuing it.

d/

-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email