Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard

Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se> Sat, 03 January 2015 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <paf@frobbit.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9342E1A0145 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:23:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.961
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.961 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lBn2IWH-H3nO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:23:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.frobbit.se (mail.frobbit.se [85.30.129.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E9C61A0092 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 13:23:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc::55a3:4750:b473:890f] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:80:3ffc:0:55a3:4750:b473:890f]) by mail.frobbit.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5E1521D27; Sat, 3 Jan 2015 22:23:44 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-httpbis-http2-16.txt> (Hypertext Transfer Protocol version 2) to Proposed Standard
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B5B08354-9A78-41D4-9857-34348655AD7D"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b4
From: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <CAK3LatGpEwb78crYV3BSVod8jD0S1SZDsFPMQFky8sFuwugweQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 22:23:34 +0100
Message-Id: <3DB67515-5DDA-4647-9A73-6893EC30A19D@frobbit.se>
References: <CAK3LatFh3ZU8ACk8grzLA9oCv2qqUHttz2z83b66xKnfs78mRA@mail.gmail.com> <54A7DBFC.8010800@cisco.com> <AEE3A9C73AC6A1C6D6BFAD95@P5> <CAK3LatGpEwb78crYV3BSVod8jD0S1SZDsFPMQFky8sFuwugweQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Delan Azabani <delan@azabani.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9v4wp2QUhHD2XVaWndWp2P15NYo
Cc: John Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 21:23:47 -0000

> On 3 jan 2015, at 18:06, Delan Azabani <delan@azabani.com> wrote:
> 
> With the introduction of the Host header, virtual hosts indeed do not
> require new interfaces or addresses, be they physical or virtual.

Specifically together with SNI.

   Patrik