Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 04 April 2017 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAD5129564 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mLSvhsWk6tjl for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:11:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x244.google.com (mail-wr0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD1C212778E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x244.google.com with SMTP id w43so43755436wrb.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 14:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=C+U4MKhwEW5DJWOmdAa4nDi0UM2IDf+TDMFZjg1Glgc=; b=boMXnOpHqtX68At1OAOLIt8VmGMPThI4p9C8L7Tee2HrYIJgt6Kjqg7BljOJ0TgQ+8 zxK4bYJgvohEsA/BFBIHsrt03PXJXLPS4pLyFYUcMR0N/DwJ57ZDaAIeb1tZS0U7c61C bv2vvyEHUOQDX3Uao7fOWaGr8ov5QIB9GM7zdOEtmrUe463E2oYdl5iz0vqnepXgIOXz fiJX0G7aLwT2eX4j4N6QyXGfNu73EUd5aoP5PvjAHBgCr/r4wYZTheOuYioRWjEQX4XA 9DZ/W2EgMcqPRCfW5Vc73ySfMEYNNk0+KUE7cxuaomWZK3/Fx3SdiY1rnTlDXMZZLsZr 3neA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=C+U4MKhwEW5DJWOmdAa4nDi0UM2IDf+TDMFZjg1Glgc=; b=odEOPt8Cr3Hf+tJK8BP/MvyIEHuUWtaHG9wxjabqcnovtC4iTYakVNEheqh/BUnWyP ka9a23xvte5EzQTC/OuRevN63ryB7tpZnNQBeRx/rq1YjuNbCZ0NEQbcdv4L/81cty2C 9eoX3GijZZJgmND/BBYa1xmHMfve1noSiyIQAU8d3p0Cyes3PSAsTLKKoFHGppwSb2Tn AI+6I9W6jx/t/nrMNh1tZiXzV3qh3DbPukc+tWCPFJpCsDxPMWMowZnaQKZnwtsbqHjI PRdCyaakvQAESEup8CzDr+pCl8LX7wL1hXZntPXLWKzThd1lxCDBg45pZWCUwpefGkci 48fw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1PZomW3dw2VZQLx7IQe2EvV37Hr6cG2Xq9XrwYSIbsMo7nRavO3sRwDSZXa32tag==
X-Received: by 10.223.166.170 with SMTP id t39mr18402611wrc.44.1491340313397; Tue, 04 Apr 2017 14:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.18] ([46.120.57.147]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v186sm19776464wmv.2.2017.04.04.14.11.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Apr 2017 14:11:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <3D4D193E-0D41-44DD-BB0C-E7741A7A2260@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_09B2C8BF-DCE5-4A7A-AC19-19012488DF0B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Subject: Re: IAOC requesting input on (potential) meeting cities
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:11:49 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20170404204617.GC16732@puck.nether.net>
Cc: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
References: <149096990336.4276.3480662759931758139.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <9fee9874-1306-07a2-a84a-4e09381a5336@cisco.com> <E67FDB14-9895-48E0-A334-167172D322DB@nohats.ca> <20170403152624.GA11714@gsp.org> <93404c29-78ba-ff9b-9170-f5f2a5389a31@gmail.com> <E068F01A-B720-4E7A-A60F-AA5BDA22D535@consulintel.es> <20170404181505.GA4004@localhost> <CAAQiQRcvu-BfBA_NEqZwXsHEn6ujpa2=w7P5Vu2f6GLXjKqkcA@mail.gmail.com> <20170404202446.GB4004@localhost> <2987213d-075e-beff-64f8-d316709c404a@cs.tcd.ie> <20170404204617.GC16732@puck.nether.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9xcAAeUR5Lm2zFKeyDmdB0xcUrs>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2017 21:11:57 -0000

> On 4 Apr 2017, at 23:46, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:
> 
> 	I think the thread can end until the data is reported
> and we can then provide our commentary on that.

There is not going to be data. There are going to be the results of a web questionnaire filled out by a self-selected sample.

Heavily biased data is not necessarily better than anecdote and conjecture.

Yoav