IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: The Next Generation

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Wed, 04 September 2019 03:09 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F286120072 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 20:09:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZMQ4UYPFHsZU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 20:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 794F612008A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 20:09:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BC722012; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 23:09:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:09:23 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=prZZlv69CIV5vNfFp0cuzWr5zfr2tM4eN1TBH19k5 zY=; b=YVI/BgQCQtEgqLulMJnY+ITY/MHGhruT+GPiInlHpAZfkEZ/dIT1/xbIZ pbH0OKV8xoIN7a0QuxuaYQvm+RrGb9c9deYWrkRmeqEBFVs9RYz372sJRGLnPYMi gQM4NhbVGIde8A02onNixYgfe1pOMp3H+/uio0IS9hC/JgxmsUh7ibM3d06YYF+U ScIc2J8/YSAjA4cXKMzk1Xu5m2oBxpQsxQzPL/jlDf3TG1EzGd6OKlgSlw6ybTnn 3SuOyN7aOBY5BRvtRJ9a01X2UQ3kOjf1LYy7SkCzalqyWGXUv10lDoudB0GPg5uy ZMj+uSG1AH9BGypMoAV+E6NJm6IRQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:4ipvXaP_gUzrCks9KRlumVLWkVmXyPDi0HGMmZt8PEfq6DOB_Cq_6g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudejgedgieegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtje ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucfkphepuddtkedrvddvuddrudektddrud ehnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghr vghtihgtshdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:4ipvXeNTSXKzA-c6eO3mUZbRRrIUMNjUB1jKB4IQMBqJFo36kXdlOA> <xmx:4ipvXS9JbpKfyNKp2TYyZJAttQZDTxiWsuOJw5eEtUX182IwD57S_w> <xmx:4ipvXS5ZUtwIZ75R6mdZYS6tAtrQIC2m4PMpsxK-0Zt4g0KB4cLVAw> <xmx:4ypvXTuQM65S_mnBgRvnP_WhDZusQt2ES5qBn__GIR1DS_ueCBkLQg>
Received: from [192.168.1.66] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F0CB3D6005B; Tue, 3 Sep 2019 23:09:21 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: The Next Generation
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAChr6Sz3j0iLGsB2bGvfitPzCkiTCJYHfmUF5S-8zPYMt1r+3A@mail.gmail.com> <4c3fd712-2485-83bb-2bb8-5855e37f6c8f@lounge.org> <CAChr6SzZb0YN0wLDaPaqbcPU8YmoMoVKXUpAFZ5GKTW=gFEs3g@mail.gmail.com> <94fe0180-878c-b523-6a34-420fce60c3a8@lounge.org> <CAChr6SxchZ7fL_NwiC0yTAs1EObp0MfKSd=VovVHPbgt7GkFtw@mail.gmail.com> <E7276802-C7A8-4491-AD8F-6B8C0B212CE3@cooperw.in>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <b39737bc-1ae1-2e19-be90-96bac35ab79b@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2019 23:09:21 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E7276802-C7A8-4491-AD8F-6B8C0B212CE3@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/9zGo9PDcR7HHGciDybmsE12rg7s>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2019 03:09:27 -0000

I think it's interesting that IESG's list of bad behavior cites "sexist 
comments or overtones" and "racist comments or overtones", but not 
"ageist comments or overtones" and actually appears to endorse ageism: 
'Avoiding bad behavior between "old-timers" and those who "can take 
it"'... thus explicitly associating "bad behavior" with age.

And while I think it's fine to try to draft a list of bad behavior - 
because I definitely appreciate efforts to define that more precisely - 
is it really fine to try to enforce that list without getting IETF 
consensus on it?

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email