Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 15 February 2017 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA9F12952F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 02:54:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4-LG13cOjE9j for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 02:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ua0-x22f.google.com (mail-ua0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4AE6129416 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 02:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ua0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id 96so103342101uaq.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 02:54:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ysrgyj+7vGyISwXR9h/zJsI5NKkeI80/cDUt/NxRMTI=; b=beuIDdypNaE6ltu+cByfTllNZVw8qlGZua/w3vriuKQ+yUJNPNmh0/b73/OGmS3rVU r6re/ll524rshFnaU+D0jvImZEj/R6pd70jgtScGWkCU1JmBofo8/Kta+GVMEyrBGGuv Mb0KfftQo91dt8dDE8K70ALK3Q3lCrDA2tEdG0g2h7i9475w4vG23wOK+vsWViyauGui E6jZpj9sOhPqyLubGqP7TSWJuotwIenvZOGgjzXRTNXNCXgswrNhBO/LMZJmuXb4O3mt +yh4ugTARc6nxXDm/DPZB+/6x2Mhv9Rr2hiDC0yJAhu1r7AkCKyJWu6r/lhW+xAW9oMb nNbQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ysrgyj+7vGyISwXR9h/zJsI5NKkeI80/cDUt/NxRMTI=; b=R5DRcRTHcoHDLNO7AlQkkyXiS+PdvtDTRJNFmCQAv1E3cha8tWu95ehTuaLQpDc/8q GjsONE/l8jb5+HYK8RfBe/a17lP0ROdqDEATzdkHMgYZukD/aAhUZZwvhpS0U5tJFUu+ zoBBD+iEYriqlUmpLHlPRJSFtPAaiqUn24aQtxRM8vWgOJYuJadIqM5EvEU2vjSbZXT7 Zf3X0tRd/yIMfjLO2cQjp1gdo7MHku3ASwD+wC5cKX9lcJoihLPwrGYbehyyJSCO4nMy bB8sdQThNdq5A0QZllTjnUdcpWueVIGw4TcpADM55EHeBUh9GVZocHxXPr5TKwbRskeZ ap2w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nrpygmtNN+nZFla9YQWXT11G5Eog92/SQreDQuesIEMfPCXVASmeCoBqWo9Lx1hw1Hnsyv0bjf9JtU/RCK
X-Received: by 10.159.49.66 with SMTP id n2mr18450501uab.72.1487156065541; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 02:54:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 02:54:04 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAN-Dau1Z+_nYJMi_pNSRzpXRO8H8qV5rZApTK6m0_Eg5yCReFA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <148599306190.18700.14784486605754128729.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAN-Dau0kDiSNXsyq9-xEdS5mzLt-K+MYHqoV8aC8jDVREw8OPQ@mail.gmail.com> <8e5c950a-0957-4323-670f-f3d07f40b4df@gmail.com> <CAN-Dau30OuJ7_57302shrSOs8+sc6iaoDgV27umxb59uwb_pZQ@mail.gmail.com> <E780DEC3-F0E9-4A35-B3EA-8D6961775276@consulintel.es> <CAN-Dau24tGpEvFEjk7xdu9tyN30bYwB6GmVMQjtKHs8LYFAJMQ@mail.gmail.com> <2A163C6E-FFBE-4502-BC2F-0DE8DF88C081@consulintel.es> <CAN-Dau2Qv1dww_yxgw_SCx+zmVjXrctkPRoTK9i1x2--zHrxRg@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3Bt34A0uhujKgfBwf9BHw=nNgnm1DR9o80qrNdvWJ9Mw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN-Dau1Z+_nYJMi_pNSRzpXRO8H8qV5rZApTK6m0_Eg5yCReFA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 02:54:04 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3M8n7a5uFTiHmqv5TZj-7ShChRSSseHwYyjwC0X-hREA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045e2fee03697a05488f81d4
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/A2xTG-WYNoHDAWLhp9QyLAnO7Io>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Jordi Palet Martinez <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:54:29 -0000

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 10:55 PM, David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> wrote:

> I conceded that is probably true for most of the IPv4-Embedded IPv6
> Address Formats in section 2.2 of RFC6052, but the /96 format seems
> indistinguishable from other IPv6 addresses with embedded IPv4 addresses
> described in Section 2.4.5 of this draft.
>

Could we say that the IID is 64 bits long "for all addresses except those
that start with binary 000, and those that embed IPv4 addresses [RFC 6052]"?