Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Thu, 13 February 2020 07:11 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89DC91200B5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:11:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BXgLBUHkfDby for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:11:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDDE91200B2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 23:11:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.42.112] (p548DC4D8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.196.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48J72z3hBZz11R1; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:11:07 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Subject: Re: IETF 107 and Corona Virus?
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR03MB54220BB50CB38B6F4A72FC58EE1A0@VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 08:11:07 +0100
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 603270666.977522-86a00eee152fbef06cdf99354e6e162d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <ED91037B-A696-46B9-B5D2-9532E0772013@tzi.org>
References: <VE1PR03MB54220BB50CB38B6F4A72FC58EE1A0@VE1PR03MB5422.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
To: Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/A5OsmSy74BrMsqNo4KI5W74bjL4>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:11:18 -0000

Jay Daley answered this question already before you asked:
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/TA9rALRWCqB2Y1AX9XjSWeX31-w>
(On this very mailing list.)

Grüße, Carsten


> On 2020-02-13, at 07:48, Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> I am just wondering if there are any thoughts on the status of the IETF 107 meeting in light of the corona virus.
> 
> Particularly in light of the fact that for safety reasons mobile world congress has been cancelled and we're seeing other events being cancelled in light of this as well.  Should it be considered a safe and responsible move to go ahead with this meeting or should we be looking at an entirely virtual meeting in light of the situation?
> 
> Andrew
>