Re: IPmix.

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Sun, 20 November 2016 19:07 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264F6129464 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:07:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=opendkim.org header.b=HyTaDvIR; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elandsys.com header.b=VWfn/1H1
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dQC2-yaxhQ8T for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:07:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C081112973D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:07:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from SUBMAN.elandsys.com ([197.224.35.56]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAKJ6lhs007851 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:06:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1479668819; x=1479755219; bh=oUlCwFETnV6s1qKY0gwB7GkDrSm0rGqgc65cgD1AGQo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=HyTaDvIRs6qAOB1ydMlJNFs+51ew9M5ACq7xajHKhxRhJ2Ax8nL8IZL2Et5q+tZJI v9IzTAWnT7mIdSht1oz9lVl1n2okkWhrrnHnWBUYfdZHqPIhpmbt1sh21e3hIWEF+H IXUAeh4tU34Kxi/1BLkUD9oYBBH/cfT6SJ/fuFWo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1479668819; x=1479755219; i=@elandsys.com; bh=oUlCwFETnV6s1qKY0gwB7GkDrSm0rGqgc65cgD1AGQo=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=VWfn/1H1NxfUClJLxMzED8nmP9qc3p2hmt4BiF36vBaxbbRnf3D5p/CF7lfh2/qND 59YtRkeJ5wxyxSmQdCzX3riaZvVB38hTnSTWyr9VrW5cP9ZGpQ6CDl1eNGPCONjpNK KMq4BR355IeVgrox079t/b1hd9g2/VF6ieO+1goc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20161120100322.0acc97f8@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:05:30 -0800
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@hotmail.com>
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: IPmix.
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR04MB144901D56F1E2DC6A770D2EEBDB20@HE1PR04MB1449.eurpr d04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <HE1PR04MB144901D56F1E2DC6A770D2EEBDB20@HE1PR04MB1449.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/A61InPa5f0xU59BruzhSb9xceik>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 19:07:04 -0000

Hi Khaled,
At 09:44 20-11-2016, Khaled Omar wrote:
>You can find the new modified IPmix text RFC version attached.

The usual way to submit an Internet-Draft is through 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/submit/

The Sergeant-at-arms wrote a message [1] about the previous document 
which was sent as an attachment. He stated that "you need to check 
with the relevant chairs to find the right venue" [1].  In my opinion 
the ietf@ietf.org mailing list is not the best venue to discuss about 
your proposal as the Sergeant-at-arms already commented about that in 
his message.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

1. https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg99875.html