IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 27 June 2008 19:08 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49CB3A6B2F; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF37E3A68B4 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.224
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.224 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.225, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_74=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gnPX5XMv3sv6 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:08:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034443A6B2F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:08:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m5RJ8ljF020395 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:08:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1214593738; x=1214680138; bh=+gCqpq34hSV+C4rT4xu2bfvGaV47QJph5ETP r/uDcjY=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To: References:Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=F25XMfae7Ft22dcENr1yCXRVvL IvK4KcFPaNWLTeY4FKYL3uQvTVnRnMC0Q46h7lrRtV2L10E4knt1NtcswFjDv/d6M/x LF8rbg2ixq2JUbPlSjK4aOYsJqVJxNhX2e0jH6QQV9p8ga28Gw5vrycdW+rdS4e6aaG PRyRbFBegCk=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=fyoOgBR84EAZl2vfiOow2iaYcYeIbju3LEImPGs0dN2PdxQ5M+x/Q7xsKoOnG4a7x 6npdA6IRJvbCE6ZfSA/z4AiR/B0XEjUPPlucuS6WrP0IjyrjgJFsOaPJsAO6rX9kfmG 8YS8hItMt+vQig2b3vs7R/5kQ1LNl+Jb5DIq5UM=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20080627114958.02b03898@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:08:27 -0700
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Update of RFC 2606 based on the recent ICANN changes ?
In-Reply-To: <4C0AE13D-4CA6-4989-A6B0-555A014DE464@multicasttech.com>
References: <4C0AE13D-4CA6-4989-A6B0-555A014DE464@multicasttech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Marshall,
At 11:43 27-06-2008, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
>I have been having a discussion on NANOG about possible problems with
>the new Top Level Domains coming out of ICANN. It seems like additional
>TLD domains, beyond just the 4 in RFC 2606, should be either 
>reserved or blocked.

Frank posted an I-D to update RFC 2606
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ellermann-idnabis-test-tlds-06

>Suggestions include .local (apparently
>used heavily by Microsoft), .internal, as well as maybe translations
>of .test .example .invalid .localhost into
>other languages / character sets.

The I-D has an IDN section.  See http://idn.icann.org/ for the 
example.test names.

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email